Laserfiche WebLink
' also observed in TIP-14, above the localized clean sand layer. The fill/weathered glacial till soils thickness <br />varied across the three sites. At Site 1 the soils ranged from 2.5 to 6.5 feet deep; at Site 2 from 3 to 6 feet <br />' deep; and at Site 3 from 4 to 5.5 feet deep. These soils may consist of reworked glacially consolidated soils <br />(fill) that were graded during the original site development or weathered glacially consolidated soils. <br />' 3.3.1.3. Glacial Till <br />Glacial till was encountered below the fill/weathered till in all of the test pits completed at Sites 1 and 3, <br />and in TP-5 at the south end of Site 2. When encountered, the glacial till extended to the depths explored. <br />' The glacial till generally consists of dense to very dense silty sand with variable gravel and cobble content. <br />3.3.1.4. Glaciolacustrine Deposits <br />' Glaciolacustrine deposits were encountered below the fill/weathered glacially consolidated soils in the <br />northern three -fourths of Site 2 (test pits TP-1 through TP-4). The glaciolacustrine deposits consisted of <br />medium stiff to hard silt and clay and typically exhibited oxidation staining near the top of the unit. When <br />' encountered, the glaciolacustrine deposits extended to the depths explored. <br />Although not encountered in our test pits, boulders are common in glacially consolidated soils and should <br />be anticipated during construction. <br />3.3.2. Groundwater Conditions <br />' Groundwater and groundwater seepage were not encountered during our test pit excavations. It should be <br />noted however, that perched groundwater should be expected to vary as a function of season, precipitation <br />and other factors. Seepage zones should also be expected to develop in the fill material, perched above <br />' the dense glacial till and glaciolacustrine deposits. <br />' 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Based on the results of our subsurface exploration program, geotechnical laboratory testing, analyses, and <br />' experience on other similar projects, we conclude thatthe proposed Baker Heights Redevelopment project <br />can be constructed satisfactorily as planned with respect to geotechnical elements. The primary <br />geotechnical considerations for the project are summarized below: <br />' ■ The site is classified as Site Class C, in accordance with the 2015 International Building Code (IBC). <br />' ■ Shallow foundations can be constructed on the glacially consolidated soils. Allowable bearing pressures <br />of 6,000 and 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for footings bearing on native <br />undisturbed dense to very dense glacial till and stiff to hard glaciolacustrine deposits, respectively. An <br />' allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf may be used where imported structural fill is placed below <br />footings, if needed, that extends to the native glacially consolidated soils. Glacial till can be expected <br />over most of Site 1 and glaciolacustrine deposits can be expected over much of Site 2. <br />' ■ Conventional slabs -on -grade are considered appropriate and should be underlain by a 6-inch-thick layer <br />of capillary break consisting of clean crushed rock with negligible fines and sand content. <br />■ Below -grade walls and retaining structures should be evaluated using an equivalent fluid density of <br />35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) provided that the walls will not be restrained against rotation when <br />backfill is placed. If the walls will be restrained from rotation, we recommend using an equivalent fluid <br />density of 55 pcf. <br />GEOENGINEER� <br />October 30, 2019 Page 4 <br />He No. 21288-002 00 <br />