Laserfiche WebLink
r ' <br /> Tony Lee <br /> From: Chris Holland <cholland@iccsafe.org> <br /> Sent: Monday,June 19, 2017 7:10 AM <br /> To: Tony Lee <br /> Cc: Renee Testroet <br /> Subject: RE: Sections 102, 105, 606.2 - 2015 IPMC <br /> June 15, 2017 <br /> Code Section: Section 606.2 in the 2012 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) <br /> Tony, <br /> This e-mail is in response to your e-mail of June 12, 2017. <br /> Section 606.2 in the IPMC states that in buildings equipped with a passenger elevator, the elevator must be <br /> maintained in operation at all times the building is occupied. This would be the case whether the elevator was <br /> required when the building was built or not. <br /> Code opinions issued by ICC staff are based on ICC-published codes and do not include local, state or federal <br /> codes, policies or amendments. This opinion is based on the information which you have provided. We have <br /> made no independent effort to verify the accuracy of this information nor have we conducted a review beyond <br /> the scope of your question. This opinion does not imply approval of an equivalency, specific product, specific <br /> design, or specific installation and cannot be published in any form implying such approval by the International <br /> Code Council. As this opinion is only advisory, the final decision is the responsibility of the designated authority <br /> charged with the administration and enforcement of this code. <br /> "Copyright @ 2017 International Code Council, Inc. All rights reserved." <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Chris Holland <br /> Senior Technical Staff <br /> Architectural & Engineering Services <br /> International Code Council, Inc. <br /> From: Tony Lee [mailto:TLee@everettwa.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:03 PM <br /> To: Chris Holland <br /> Subject: RE: Sections 102, 105, 606.2 - 2015 IPMC <br /> Hi Chris—thank you for your reply. I was wondering if you could still make time for the specific question that I asked? <br /> The two requests that you received do involve the same building but do not agree on the back story that you were <br /> presented by the other party—which is what I was intending to keep ICC out of to begin with. In order for me to make a <br /> better-informed opinion I was hoping to get some background on the intent of the code section, not how to apply it <br /> based on a given set of circumstances (which are not completely presented to you by either requester). <br /> Section 606.2 <br /> Questions <br /> i <br />