Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br />c) What other work does your firm have under way or is anticipated to be in progress <br />during the time frame of this project. <br />d) Describe your approach to the project. What achievements would you use to <br />determine project success? Include how all three design projects will be designed <br />concurrently. <br />e) What risks do you foresee with this project? <br />f) Describe your ability to estimate and forecast construction costs on similar projects. <br />g) Describe your approach to analyzing whether a Project Labor Agreement and <br />Community Workforce Agreement is beneficial to construct this project. <br />3. PERFORMANCE <br />a) Submit no more than five (5) completed relevant project experiences, within the past <br />ten years that demonstrate successful contract performance similar in size and scope <br />as described in this RFQ, including any government experience. Include the following <br />for each reference: <br />o Company name and full address <br />o Point of contact name, title, e-mail address, and phone number <br />o Contract title, number, start and completion dates <br />o Contract value, description and order / service details <br />3.3 EVALUATION <br />A numerical scale will be used to score each section for the written submittal. These track the <br />submittal format on the previous two pages. The total score for each section will not exceed the <br />maximum number of points set for that section. Scoring will be as follows: <br />Qualifications & Experience 40 <br />Approach & Capability 45 <br />Performance 15 <br />Total 100 <br /> <br />Oral Interview: Subsequent to the City’s review of written submittals, the City may conduct interviews. <br />If the City elects to do this, identical questions will be prepared and distributed to each team to be <br />interviewed, as well as questions that are customized for each team. Additional questions both for and <br />to the team may be addressed during oral interviews. Each team’s demonstrated experience, <br />qualifications, completeness, clarity, and professionalism as demonstrated through its oral <br />presentation and answers to questions will be used in ranking teams in order of preference.