Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 1165620 <br />Lyashenko Accessory Dwelling Unit Development April 10, 2020 <br />Everett, Washington Page 5 <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />It is our opinion that the planned site development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Our <br />explorations indicated that the site is generally underlain by competent native glacial bearing soils at <br />relatively shallow depths. The native glacial soils encountered at depth should provide adequate <br />support for foundation, slab, and pavement loads. We recommend that the planned structures be <br />designed utilizing shallow foundations. Footings should extend through any loose soil or undocumented <br />fill soils and be founded on the underlying medium dense or better native glacial bearing soils, or <br />structural fill extending to these soils. The medium dense or better native glacial bearing soils should <br />typically be encountered approximately 4.0 to 7.5 feet below the existing ground surface, based on our <br />explorations. We should note that localized areas of deeper unsuitable soils and/or undocumented fill <br />could be encountered at this site. This condition would require additional excavations in foundation, <br />slab, and pavement areas to remove the unsuitable soils. Alternatively, to limit excavation and grading <br />work, especially if the proposed ADU is to be situated within the lower northeastern corner of the site, <br />foundations could be supported on 4-inch pin piles to advance structure foundations through upper <br />undocumented fill soils down to competent native. This option is further discussed in the Deep <br />Foundations subsection of the report. <br />Based on the results of our infiltration testing and the presence of groundwater seepage within our <br />explorations, it is our opinion that the onsite native soils are not suitable for stormwater infiltration. <br />However, shallow, low -impact design infiltration systems and/or dispersion systems may be feasible at <br />specific areas within the site depending on final layout as determined by the civil engineer. This is <br />further discussed in the Site Drainage section of this report. <br />Erosion Control <br />The erosion hazard for the on -site soils is interpreted to be slight to moderate for exposed soils, but <br />actual erosion potential will be dependent on how the site is graded and how water is allowed to <br />concentrate. Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be used to control erosion. Areas disturbed <br />during construction should be protected from erosion. Erosion control measures may include diverting <br />surface water away from the stripped or disturbed areas. Silt fences and/or straw bales should be <br />erected to prevent muddy water from leaving the site. Disturbed areas should be planted as soon as <br />practical and the vegetation should be maintained until it is established. The erosion potential of areas <br />not stripped of vegetation should be low. <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />