My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3333 NASSAU ST 2024-08-07
>
Address Records
>
NASSAU ST
>
3333
>
3333 NASSAU ST 2024-08-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2024 12:04:26 PM
Creation date
5/28/2024 11:35:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
NASSAU ST
Street Number
3333
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region <br /> Project Site: Norton Ave City/County: EveretUSnohomish Sampling Date: 8/29/16 <br /> Applicant/Owner: Lewis State: WA Sampling Point: SL-1 <br /> Investigator(s): Legere Section,Township,Range: <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 15 <br /> Subregion(LRR): A Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Hydric <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) <br /> Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes El No ❑ <br /> Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. <br /> Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El <br /> Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ® Is the Sampled Area Yes 0 No El <br /> Ywithin a Wetland? <br /> Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No <br /> Remarks: <br /> • <br /> VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants <br /> Tree Stratum Plot size:30' Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: <br /> ( —) %Cover Species? Status <br /> 1. Acer macroohvllum 20 y FACU Number of Dominant Species <br /> 3 (A) <br /> 2. Prunus emarqinata 10 y FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: <br /> 3. Alnus rubra 5 no FAC Total Number of Dominant <br /> 4. — — <br /> Species Across All Strata: — (B) <br /> 50%=17.5,20%=7 35 =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species <br /> Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:ID That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 38 (NB) <br /> 1. Rubus armeniacus 35 yea FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: <br /> 2. Fallopia japonica 10 yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: <br /> 3. OBL species xl= <br /> 4. FACW species x2= <br /> 5. FAC species x3= <br /> 50%=22.5,20%=9 45 =Total Cover FACU species x4= — <br /> Herb Stratum(Plot size:30' • UPL species x5= <br /> 1. Urtica dioica • 20 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) <br /> 2. Polvstichum munitum 10 m FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= <br /> 3. Epilobium anqustifolium 5 no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 4. Gvmnocaroium drvopteris 5 no FACU ❑ 1—Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation <br /> 5. 112-Dominance Test is>50% <br /> 6. 0 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' <br /> — — <br /> 7. ❑ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting <br /> 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) <br /> 9. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' <br /> — — — <br /> 10. — — <br /> ElProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) <br /> 11. _ <br /> 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must <br /> 50%=20,20%=8 40 =Total Cover <br /> be present,unless disturbed or problematic. <br /> Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:30' <br /> 1. Convolvulus arvensis 75 ym UPL <br /> 2. Solanum dulcamara 20 y FAC Hydrophytic <br /> Vegetation Yes ❑ No El <br /> 50%=47.5,20%=19 95 =Total Cover Present? <br /> %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 <br /> Remarks: <br /> US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.