My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Granite Construction 6/3/2024
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
>
Granite Construction 6/3/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2024 9:14:55 AM
Creation date
6/4/2024 8:48:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Granite Construction
Approval Date
6/3/2024
Council Approval Date
5/29/2024
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Daniel Enrico
Subject / Project Title
Edgewater Creek Bridge Replacement
Public Works WO Number
Federal Aid No. BRM 2776 (009)
Tracking Number
0004373
Total Compensation
$25,409,890.65
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Contract Subtype
Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Imported from EPIC
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
823
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Edgewater Creek Bridge Replacement November 2023 109 and in accordance with AASH-TO T 168. A minimum of three samples should be taken 1 for each class of HMA placed on a project. If used in a structural application, at least one 2 of the three samples shall to be tested. 3 4 Sampling and testing HMA in a Structural application where quantities are less than 400 5 tons is at the discretion of the Engineer. 6 7 For HMA used in a structural application and with a total project quantity less than 800 8 tons but more than 400 tons, a minimum of one acceptance test shall be performed. In 9 all cases, a minimum of 3 samples will be obtained at the point of acceptance, a 10 minimum of one of the three samples will be tested for conformance to the JMF: 11 12 • If the test results are found to be within specification requirements, additional 13 testing will be at the Engineer’s discretion. 14 • If test results are found not to be within specification requirements, additional 15 testing of the remaining samples to determine a Composite Pay Factor (CPF) shall 16 be performed. 17 18 5-04.3(9)C3 Mixture Nonstatistical Evaluation – Acceptance Testing 19 Testing of HMA for compliance of Va will at the option of the Contracting Agency. If 20 tested, compliance of Va will use WSDOT SOP 731. 21 22 Testing for compliance of asphalt binder content will be by WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T 23 308. 24 25 Testing for compliance of gradation will be by FOP for WAQTC T 27/T 11. 26 27 5-04.3(9)C4 Mixture Nonstatistical Evaluation – Pay Factors 28 For each lot of material falling outside the tolerance limits in 5-04.3(9), the Contracting 29 Agency will determine a Composite Pay Factor (CPF) using the following price 30 adjustment factors: 31 32 Table of Price Adjustment Factors Constituent Factor “f” All aggregate passing: 1½″, 1″, ¾″, ½″, ⅜″ and No.4 sieves 2 All aggregate passing No. 8 sieve 15 All aggregate passing No. 200 sieve 20 Asphalt binder 40 Air Voids (Va) (where applicable) 20 33 Each lot of HMA produced under Nonstatistical Evaluation and having all constituents 34 falling within the tolerance limits of the job mix formula shall be accepted at the unit 35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.