Laserfiche WebLink
EMC Title 15, Local Project Review Procedures Page 6 of 94 <br />The Everett Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 4031-24, passed May 22, 2024. <br />D. Withdrawal of Preliminary or Final Approvals. Except for formal subdivisions as provided by <br />RCW 58.17.170, if a division of land or boundary line adjustment application was procured by <br />misrepresentation, lack of material disclosure or erroneous information, or if there was <br />deficient public notice as a direct result of the applicant or based on erroneous information or, <br />if in the opinion of the planning director, a substantial change in conditions of approval has <br />occurred and construction has not commenced, the city or hearing examiner may withdraw its <br />approval of the project and require the applicant to correct the application. If the approval is <br />withdrawn, the city or the hearing examiner shall issue a new decision on the application <br />consistent with the review processes and standards of this title. (Ord. 3774-20 § 3 (Exh. 2), 2020.) <br />15.01.035 Land division, supplemental requirements. <br />Supplemental requirements for certain Review Process I land divisions (minor amendments to <br />land divisions, boundary line adjustments, and binding site plans with previously approved site <br />plans) are as follows: <br />A. Criteria for Minor Amendment. For the purposes of this title, a minor amendment shall meet <br />the following criteria: <br />1. The proposal represents a minor adjustment of lot lines or lot frontage that does not <br />increase or decrease said lot lines and/or frontage in excess of ten percent; <br />2. The proposal does not result in substantial changes in the design or location of access, <br />parking, circulation, drainage or public utility improvements; <br />3. The proposal does not result in additional lots or potential number of dwelling units; <br />4. The proposal would not modify or be in conflict with any of the conditions of <br />preliminary approval; <br />5. In the opinion of the planning director, the proposal would not have an adverse effect <br />on other lots within the project or on adjacent properties; and <br />6. The proposal is consistent with Titles 13, 19, 20 and other applicable city code <br />provisions and standards.