Laserfiche WebLink
EMC Title 15, Local Project Review Procedures Page 60 of 94 <br />The Everett Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 4031-24, passed May 22, 2024. <br />deadline, the hearing examiner may dismiss the appeal, issue a decision on the basis <br />of information in the record, or take other action as deemed appropriate by the <br />hearing examiner. <br />c. No person may seek judicial review of any decision or determination of the city <br />unless the person first exhausts the administrative remedies provided by the city, <br />except for an appeal of a determination by the planning director that a proposed land <br />use is in violation of the unified development code. <br />8. Jurisdiction Retained by Hearing Examiner. Whenever the hearing examiner renders a <br />decision, the hearing examiner retains jurisdiction for the purpose of making minor <br />changes. A “minor change” is one or more changes which do not alter the scope of the <br />decision. <br />a. Upon receipt of an application for a minor change, the hearing examiner may <br />approve or disapprove a minor change by issuance of a written order. <br />b. It shall be the discretion of the hearing examiner to reconvene the hearing. If the <br />hearing examiner does not reconvene the hearing, the hearing examiner may request <br />written clarification or comments of the minor changes. Such comments will become <br />part of the official record. <br />c. Copies of the order shall be mailed to all parties of record. Within ten days of the <br />issuance of the order, a party of record may submit a written request with the hearing <br />examiner’s office requesting a hearing. Upon receipt of such request, the hearing <br />examiner’s order approving the minor change will be stayed pending the hearing. <br />Absent receipt of a request for hearing, the order shall become final upon expiration of <br />the ten-day period. <br />d. An open record hearing on a proposed change shall be considered a subsequent <br />action and is not barred by the limitation on a single open record hearing for a land <br />use permit. <br />9. For the purposes of this subsection, the hearing examiner shall have all the powers of <br />the planning director (except for that of the SEPA responsible official), and those powers <br />necessary to fulfill his/her function as land use hearing examiner, including