Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF EVERETT WEST MARINE VIEW DRIVE/ALVERSON AND 41 ST ST/GRAND AVE <br />PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS <br />STATE FUND# HLP-PB15(032) <br />WO #3630 July 25, 2024 <br />74 <br />1 <br />2 5-04.3(10)D2 HMA Compaction Nonstatistical Evaluation Acceptance Testing <br />3 The location of the HMA compaction acceptance tests will be randomly selected by the <br />4 Engineer from within each sublot, with one test per sublot. <br />5 <br />6 5-04.3(10)D3 HMA Nonstatistical Compaction Price Adjustments <br />7 For each compaction lot with one or two sublots, having all sublots attain a relative <br />8 density that is 91 percent of the reference maximum density the HMA shall be accepted at <br />9 the unit Contract price with no further evaluation. When a sublot does not attain a relative <br />10 density that is 91 percent of the reference maximum density, the lot shall be evaluated in <br />11 accordance with Section 1-06.2 to determine the appropriate CPF. The maximum CPF <br />12 shall be 1.00, however, lots with a calculated CPF in excess of 1.00 will be used to offset <br />13 lots with CPF values below 1.00 but greater than 0.90. Lots with CPF lower than 0.90 will <br />14 be evaluated for compliance per 5-04.3(11). Additional testing by either a nuclear <br />15 moisture-density gauge or cores will be completed as required to provide a minimum of <br />16 three tests for evaluation. <br />17 <br />18 For compaction below the required 91% a Non-Conforming Compaction Factor (NCCF) <br />19 will be determined. The NCCF equals the algebraic difference of CPF minus 1.00 <br />20 multiplied by 40 percent. The Compaction Price Adjustment will be calculated as the <br />21 product of CPF, the quantity of HMA in the compaction control lot 43X+135( and the unit <br />22 Contract price per ton of mix. <br />23 <br />24 5-04.3(11) Reject Work <br />25 <br />26 5-04.3(11)A Reject Work General <br />27 Work that is defective or does not conform to Contract requirements shall be rejected. <br />28 The Contractor may propose, in writing, alternatives to removal and replacement of <br />29 rejected material. Acceptability of such alternative proposals will be determined at the sole <br />30 discretion of the Engineer. HMA that has been rejected is subject to the requirements in <br />31 Section 1-06.2(2) and this specification, and the Contractor shall submit a corrective <br />32 action proposal to the Engineer for approval. <br />33 <br />34 5-04.3(11)B Rejection by Contractor <br />35 The Contractor may, prior to sampling, elect to remove any defective material and replace <br />36 it with new material. Any such new material will be sampled, tested, and evaluated for <br />37 acceptance. <br />38 <br />39 5-04.3(11)C Rejection Without Testing (Mixture or Compaction) <br />40 The Engineer may, without sampling, reject any batch, load, or section of Roadway that <br />41 appears defective. Material rejected before placement shall not be incorporated into the <br />42 pavement. Any rejected section of Roadway shall be removed. <br />43 <br />44 No payment will be made for the rejected materials or the removal of the materials unless <br />45 the Contractor requests that the rejected material be tested. If the Contractor elects to <br />46 have the rejected material tested, a minimum of three representative samples will be <br />47 obtained and tested. Acceptance of rejected material will be based on