My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Snohomish Conservation District 10/10/2024
>
Contracts
>
Agreement
>
Grant Agreement (City as Grantee)
>
Snohomish Conservation District 10/10/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2024 10:51:53 AM
Creation date
10/11/2024 10:50:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Snohomish Conservation District
Approval Date
10/10/2024
Council Approval Date
9/11/2024
End Date
12/31/2028
Department
Parks
Department Project Manager
Kimberly Moore
Subject / Project Title
Growing Urban Forests in Everett
Tracking Number
0004540
Total Compensation
$967,493.00
Contract Type
Agreement
Contract Subtype
Grant Agreement (City as Grantee)
Retention Period
6 Years Then Destroy
Imported from EPIC
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Award Number: 24-DG-11062765-332 <br />Page 1 of 1 <br />ATTACHMENT C: WHISTLEBLOWER NOTICE <br />Whistleblowers perform an important service to USDA and the public when they come <br />forward with what they reasonably believe to be evidence of wrongdoing. They should never <br />be subject to reprisal for doing so. Federal law protects federal employees as well as personal <br />services contractors and employees of Federal contractors, subcontractors, grantees, and <br />subgrantees against reprisal for whistleblowing. USDA bears the responsibility to ensure <br />that nothing in a non-disclosure agreement which a contractor, subcontractor, <br />grantee, or subgrantee requires their employees to sign should be interpreted as limiting <br />their ability to provide information to the Office of Inspector General (OIG). <br />41 U.S.C. § 4712 requires the head of each executive agency to ensure that its contractors <br />inform their workers in writing of the rights and remedies under the statute. <br />Accordingly, it is illegal for a personal services contractor or an employee of a Federal <br />contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee to be discharged, demoted, or otherwise <br />discriminated against for making a protected whistleblower disclosure. In this context, these <br />categories of individuals are whistleblowers who disclose information that the individual <br />reasonably believes is evidence of one of the following: <br /> Gross mismanagement of a Federal contract or grant; <br /> A gross waste of Federal funds; <br /> An abuse of authority relating to a Federal contract or grant; <br /> A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or <br /> A violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal contract (including the <br />competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant. <br />To be protected under 41 U.S.C. § 4712, the disclosure must be made to one of the <br />following: <br /> A Member of Congress, or a representative of a committee of Congress; <br /> The OIG; <br /> The Government Accountability Office (GAO); <br /> A Federal employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management <br />at USDA; <br /> An otherwise authorized official at USDA or other law enforcement agency; <br /> A court or grand jury; or <br /> A management official or other employee of the contractor, subcontractor, or <br />grantee who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address <br />misconduct. <br />Under 41 U.S.C. § 4712, personal services contractors as well as employees of contractors, <br />subcontractors, grantees, or subgrantees may file a complaint with OIG, who will investigate <br />the matter unless they determine that the complaint is frivolous, fails to allege a violation of <br />the prohibition against whistleblower reprisal, or has been addressed in another proceeding. <br />OIGs investigation is then presented to the head of the executive agency who evaluates the <br />facts of the investigation and can order the contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.