My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2122 106TH ST SW 2025-03-12
>
Address Records
>
106TH ST SW
>
2122
>
2122 106TH ST SW 2025-03-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 7:36:37 AM
Creation date
10/28/2024 10:45:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
106TH ST SW
Street Number
2122
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Where replacing existing impervious surfaces unless the existing <br />surface is a non -pollution generating surface over an outwash soil with <br />a saturated hydraulic conductivity of four inches per hour or greater. <br />o At sites defined as "high use sites" in Volume I of this manual. <br />o In areas with "industrial activity" as identified in 40 CFR <br />122.26(b)(14). <br />• Where the risk of concentrated pollutant spills is more likely such as <br />gas stations, truck stops, and industrial chemical storage sites. <br />o Where routine, heavy applications of sand occur in frequent snow <br />zones to maintain traction during weeks of snow and ice accumulation. <br />A local government may designate geographic areas within which <br />permeable pavement, or certain types of permeable pavement, may be <br />designated as infeasible due to year-round, seasonal or periodic high <br />groundwater conditions, or due to inadequate infiltration rates. <br />Designations must be based upon a preponderance of field data, collected <br />within the area of concern, that indicate a high likelihood of failure to <br />achieve the minimum groundwater clearance or infiltration rates identified <br />in the above infeasibility criteria. The local government must develop a <br />technical report, and make it available upon request by the Dept. of <br />Ecology. The technical report must be authored by (a) professional(s) <br />with appropriate expertise (e.g., registered engineer, geologist, <br />hydrogeologist, or certified soil scientist), and document the location and <br />pertinent values/observations of data that were used to recommend the <br />designation and boundaries for the geographic area. The types of pertinent <br />data include, but are not limited to: <br />Standing water heights or evidence of recent saturated conditions <br />in observation wells, test pits, test holes, and well logs. <br />Observations of areal extent and time of surface ponding, including <br />local government or professional observations of high water tables, <br />frequent or long durations of standing water, springs, wetlands, <br />and/or frequent flooding. <br />Results of infiltration tests <br />In addition, a local government can map areas that meet a specific <br />infeasibility criterion listed above provided they have an adequate data <br />basis. Criteria that are most amenable to mapping are: <br />• Where land for bioretention is within an area designated by the <br />local government as an erosion hazard, or landslide hazard <br />• Within 50 feet from the top of slopes that are greater than 20% and <br />over 10 feet vertical relief <br />• Within 100 feet of a closed or active landfill <br />Volume V — Runoff Treatment BMPs — December 2014 <br />5-21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.