My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
404 14TH ST BASE FILE 2024-12-09
>
Address Records
>
14TH ST
>
404
>
BASE FILE
>
404 14TH ST BASE FILE 2024-12-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2024 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
12/9/2024 11:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
14TH ST
Street Number
404
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
726
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Any party, including the City, the Washington State Department of Ecology, the <br /> United States Environmental Protection Agency, or the user/appellant, is entitled <br /> to review of the final determination of the hearing examiner in the Snohomish <br /> County Superior Court. Provided, that any petition for review shall be filed no <br /> later than thirty(30) calendar days after date of the final determination. <br /> 2. Copies of the petition for review shall be served as in all civil actions. <br /> 3. The filing of the petition shall not stay enforcement of the final determination <br /> except by order of the superior court and on posting of a bond to be determined <br /> by the court naming the City as beneficiary. <br /> 4. The review shall be conducted by the court without a jury. The record shall be <br /> satisfied by a narrative report certified by the hearing examiner and no verbatim <br /> record of proceedings before the hearing examiner shall be required to be <br /> presented to the superior court. <br /> 5. The court may affirm the final determination or remand the matter for further <br /> proceedings before the hearing examiner; or the court may reverse the final <br /> determination if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced <br /> because the final determination was: <br /> i. In violation of constitutional provisions; or <br /> ii. In excess of the authority or jurisdiction of the hearing examiner; or <br /> iii. Arbitrary and capricious. <br /> 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.