3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-23 Geotech Report 2025-01-22

APPENDIX MI Soil samples obtained from the explorations were transported to GeoEngineers' laboratory and evaluated to confirm or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate engineering properties of the soil samples. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing to determine moisture content and grain size distribution (sieve analysis). The tests were performed in general accordance with test methods of ASTM International (ASTM) or other applicable procedures. Sold Classifications All soil samples obtained from the borings were visually classified in the field and/or in our laboratory using a system based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM classification methods. ASTM test method D 2488 was used to visually classify the soil samples, while ASTM D 2487 was used to classify the soils based on laboratory tests results. These classification procedures are incorporated in the boring logs shown in Figures A-2 through A-7 in Appendix A Moisture content tests were completed in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 for representative samples obtained from the explorations. The results of these tests are presented on the exploration logs in Appendix A at the respective samples depths. Sieve analyses were performed on selected samples in general accordance with ASTM C 136. The wet sieve analysis method was used to determine the percentage of soil greater than the U.S. No. 200 mesh sieve. The results of the sieve analyses were plotted and were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and are presented in Figures B-1 and B-2. It should be noted that the sieve analyses were performed on soils obtained from samplers that have an opening size of 11/2 inches, so larger -sized particles cannot be obtained by the samplers. Therefore, the sieve results do not account for soil particles that are larger than 11/2 inches. Soils with larger sized materials are described in this report qualitatively based on visual observations and experience on projects where excavations were made into similar formations. GEoENGINPER tune 15, 2022 Page B-1 Fite Nv; 0129-294-02