Laserfiche WebLink
June 9,2022 <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br /> Geotechnical Evaluation <br /> The areas highlighted in yellow are present within the eastern portion of the property. <br /> These include areas with slope magnitudes in excess of 4o percent and appear to be underlain by <br /> Vashon Advance Outwash. <br /> We did not observe evidence of historic or recent landslide activity or severe erosion on the <br /> subject or adjacent properties. <br /> 3. Erosion hazard areas: <br /> a. Those areas defined as high and very high/severe risk of erosion in the Dames and Moore <br /> Methodology for the Inventory, Classification and Designation of Geologically Hazardous Areas, <br /> City of Everett,Washington:July 1, 1991,or as revised through best available science: <br /> (1) High erosion hazard areas include slopes of twenty-five to forty percent in Qva and Qal <br /> geologic units;and slopes of greater than forty percent in other(not Qva or Qal)geologic units. <br /> (2) Very high/severe erosion hazard areas include slopes of greater than forty percent in Qva <br /> and Qal geologic units. <br /> b. Those areas defined as medium risk of erosion in the Dames and Moore Methodology for the <br /> Inventory, Classification and Designation of Geologically Hazardous Areas, City of Everett, <br /> Washington: July 1, 1991, or as revised through best available science, when they contain debris <br /> and mud flows,gullying or rifling,immature vegetation,or no vegetation: <br /> (i) Slopes of twenty-five to forty percent in other(not Qva or Qal)geologic units. <br /> 4. Other areas which the city has reason to believe are geologically hazardous. <br /> In general, the erosion potential at the site varies from low to very high depending on the slope <br /> magnitudes. Severe erosion potentials generally include areas with slopes of is percent or more <br /> in outwash soils. <br /> The eastern portion of the site would have a very high erosion potential; however,typical erosion <br /> control measures and proper grading should adequately manage erosion during construction. <br /> Proper final grading and surfacing should result in a decrease in the erosion potential in these <br /> areas. <br /> B. Geologically Hazardous Slope Setbacks and Slope Protection. <br /> 1. Geotechnical Assessment Requirements.Development proposals on or within two hundred <br /> feet of any area designated as or which, based on site-specific field investigation, the city has <br /> reason to believe are geologically hazardous areas shall submit a geological assessment as <br /> required by subsection F of this section. <br /> 2. The setback buffer requirement shall be based upon information contained in a geological <br /> assessment, and shall be measured on a horizontal plane from a vertical line established at the <br /> edge of the geologically hazardous area limits (both from the top and toe of slope). In the event <br /> that a specific setback buffer is not included in the recommendation of the geological assessment, <br /> the setback buffer shall be based upon the standards contained in Chapter 19.18 of the <br /> International Building Code(IBC),or as the IBC is updated and amended. <br /> a. If the geological assessment recommends setback buffers that are less than the <br /> standard buffers that would result from application of Chapter 19.18 of the IBC, the specific <br /> rationale and basis for the reduced buffers shall be clearly articulated in the geological <br /> assessment. <br /> www.cobaltgeo.com (206)331-1097 <br />