Laserfiche WebLink
3 of 9 <br /> The results are summarized below: <br /> Helical Piles #1,#4: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 23.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 18.8 kips/pile <br /> Helical Piles #2-#3: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 21.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 20.4kips/pile <br /> Helical Piles #5,#10: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 13.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 17.2 kips/pile <br /> Helical Piles #6-#8: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 8.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 19.6 kips/pile <br /> Helical Piles #9: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 10.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 20.4kips/pile <br /> Helical Piles #11-#14: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 10.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 25.1 kips/pile <br /> Concentric Piles #1-#3: <br /> Maximum Demand (allowable): 13.0 kips/pile <br /> Available Capacity (allowable): 18.2 kips/pile <br /> It should be noted that driving of the helical piles had to be halted prematurely due to lifting of the structure. <br /> The final capacity exceeded the min required capacity with a F.S. of 1.63 instead of the specified 2.0. This <br /> is acceptable as the lifting of the structure shows that the calculated min capacity was overly conservative. <br /> Please contact us if you have any questions. <br /> Sincerely, • • ' • <br /> �• �•i NUR . <br /> Jason Tien �5 r,F'!�A�,� ` ✓ �• <br /> L120 Engineering & Design (L120) • �P,:��` - vti�:`,F<� s <br /> jtien@1120engineering.com • `' • <br /> ■ - r <br /> Mans R. Thurfjell, P.E. r -b • <br /> L120 Engineering & Design (L120) • W • <br /> mthurfjell@1120engineering.comIN• �C` f �� • <br /> . ■ . • . <br />