Laserfiche WebLink
. • <br /> • • <br /> 3. Correction#3: <br /> This comment has not been addressed as stated by the response. The Construction Type on <br /> Sheet A-0.1 should be specified as "VB" in the "Project Data"; a "VA" type is still stated. <br /> Alternatively, fire-rated construction for the roof, beams, and columns is required per IBC Table <br /> 601. See IBC Sections 602.1 and 602.5. <br /> Response#3: <br /> Project Data section updated. <br /> Fire Protection: <br /> 4. Correction#4: <br /> Carports 1,2,and 4 are located within 5 feet of the property line and require minimum one-hour <br /> fire-rated exterior walls per IBC Section 705. See IBC Table 602 and Footnote"g"(WAC). <br /> Response#4: <br /> Carport layout has been adjusted to be 5ft away from property lines. <br /> Accessibility <br /> 5. Correction#8: <br /> The design has been revised in response to the original comment to located Carports 2, 3, and 4 at <br /> least 5 feet from the property lines. However, Carport 1 is located less than 20 feet from the <br /> existing "R-2" building with a "V-A" construction. An imaginary property line must be established <br /> between the structures and the respective fire separation distances(FSD)specified. It is noted that <br /> the existing building may not have sufficient construction for the proposed FSD without <br /> modifications. Alternatively, Carport 1 should be redesigned to provide the minimum FSD without <br /> modifications. See IBC Table 602. <br /> Response#8: <br /> Carport layout adjusted to be 20ft away from the existing building.2 out of 3 ADA stalls are covered <br /> which is proportionate to the amount of covered parking provided for non-ADA(which is about 30% <br /> uncovered and 60%covered). <br /> Structural <br /> General <br /> 1. Correction#1: <br /> This comment has not been addressed. Calculation pages 22 and 23 referenced in the response <br /> do not provide a splitting analysis of the foundation to verify that confinement will be maintained in <br /> the footings to preclude failure of the structure. Footing Detail 01/S2.0 should be provided with top <br /> reinforcement per ACI 318-14 Section 10.7.6.1.6. Alternatively,an analysis per Section 17.2.3.5.3 <br /> should be performed to substantiate that splitting of the foundation does not occur from flexural <br /> restraint of the embedded posts. See IBC Sections 1604.1 and 1604.4. <br /> Response#1: <br /> See Structural response letter&calculations(2 copies) <br /> 2I3 <br />