Laserfiche WebLink
r E© oVE �` <br /> 2. No additional comment. Garage was removed prior to Plan Submittal. AUG 0 7 2023 I <br /> Architectural CITY OF EVERETT <br /> Permit Services <br /> 1. The original comment has generally been addressed. However,additional smoke and CO alarms <br /> are required outside the second floor bedroom. i he CO alarms have been addressed regarding <br /> interconnected and hard wired with battery back up on each floor. PG 10 F raming floor plans <br /> 2. Various components of the insulation are not clear, notably due to conflicting details as noted <br /> above. The roof insulation is not specified in the details. The typical fenestration(i.e.,windows and <br /> doors)thermal ratings have not been revised for consistency with the selected energy credits(i.e., <br /> Umax=0.20). 1lie Insulation has been mote thoroughly specified on Page 7 of these revised plans <br /> 3. Roof baffles are not specified in the sections or details. The Eave baffles have been addressed <br /> on pg 8 Roofing <br /> 4. The typical notes do not provide clear ventilation requirements. Attic Ventilation has been <br /> calculated and addressed on page 8( Rooting) <br /> 5. The selected credits are not clear and appear to be inconsistent. It is also noted that Fuel Credit <br /> 2 is selected. This is a ducted heat pump that must comply with performance requirements of the <br /> commercial energy code as specified. The designer should review these requirements and verify <br /> that this system is intended. The performance requirements specified for this system should be <br /> listed in the drawings; references to the energy code table for the performance requirements does <br /> not satisfy this comment. Alternatively,a different heating system should be selected. Energy <br /> Credits Have been Corrected and Calculated on PG. 7 <br /> • <br /> 6. The performance requirements for the whole house system have not been specified. Bath fan <br /> and whole house fan specifications have been addressed and Kitchen fan will be 100cfm above <br /> stove and bath fans will be 50CFM <br /> Architectural Comments 7through 9 do not require additional action. <br /> Structural <br /> The structural comments have generally not been sufficiently addressed. See additional comments <br /> above in addition to the original comments. The drawings should be revised to address all <br /> comments. All code references should be reviewed to verify compliance. Hopefully the newly submitted <br /> plans are sufficient and all comments addressed to your satisfaction . <br /> The drawings include details(e.g.,pages 9 and 10, etc.)that are apparently obtained from a professional <br /> designer(e.g., Design Build Services, Inc., etc.)that is not understood to be associated with this <br /> project. While not a code violation,this may constitute an unlawful use of intellectual property without <br /> the designer's permission. It is recommended that this information be removed or the original <br /> designer's permission obtained to reproduce in this drawing set. <br /> The review of this project will recommence once revised construction-level drawings addressing all <br /> comments has been resubmitted. Thank you. <br /> a3 <br />