Laserfiche WebLink
From: Tony Lee <br /> Sent: Wednesday,August 14, 2024 7:33 AM <br /> To: Audrey Arbow <br /> Cc: Cindy Bergsma <br /> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: B2408-021 2501 EUCLID AVE- Duplex Certificate of <br /> Occupancy Request <br /> Follow Up Flag: Follow up <br /> Flag Status: Flagged <br /> Category 2:Sensitive information <br /> I have seen these blank ones before in the records. I am not sure what the standard was, but this isn't <br /> the only one. It should still be a review item for the building plan review group—tier 1. If there is a place <br /> for a note for the review group, please put'see Tony for guidance.' <br /> — Tony Lee <br /> Building Official I Permit Services <br /> 425.257.8812 1 3200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett, WA 98201 <br /> EVERETT everettwa.gov/permits I onlinepermits.everettwa.gov I Facebook I Twitter <br /> Note:Emails and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and may be subject to <br /> disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act. <br /> Category 2: For official use only/disclosure permissible by law. <br /> From: Audrey Arbow<AArbow@ eve rettwa.gov> <br /> Sent:Tuesday,August 13, 2024 3:18 PM <br /> To:Tony Lee<TLee@everettwa.gov> <br /> Cc: Cindy Bergsma <CBergsma@everettwa.gov> <br /> Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Re: B2408-021 2501 EUCLID AVE - Duplex Certificate of Occupancy Request <br /> Category 2:Sensitive information <br /> Hi Tony, <br /> I've got a weird one. We got a new duplex building application with only a floor plan uploaded. I reached <br /> to the applicant and then had a phone conversation with her about the request. She also had a virtual or <br /> in-person appt she mentioned while we talked on the phone. <br /> Essentially,they're not asking for a new CO for a new duplex, but for a completed CO for the existing <br /> duplex. I've attached some snippets from the digital records center on this property for reference. I <br /> found their original permit application from 1979, their final inspection report from August 1980, and <br /> the subsequent CO that was created for the duplex, which is basically blank. <br />