Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Table of Contents <br /> I Chapter 1. Introduction 1 <br /> Chapter 2. Proposed Project 3 <br /> 2.1 Location 3 <br /> I 2.2 Project Description 3 <br /> 2.3 Construction Techniques 4 <br /> 2.4 Action Area 4 <br /> I Chapter 3. Habitat Assessment Methods 8 <br /> Chapter 4. Environmental Baseline Conditions 9 <br /> 4.1 Landscape Setting 9 <br /> I 4.2 Soils/Geology 9 <br /> 4.3 Vegetation 10 <br /> 4.4 FEMA Mapped Floodplain 10 <br /> I 4.5 Snohomish River Watershed Conditions 10 <br /> 4.6 Baseline Conditions of Snohomish River in Project Area 11 <br /> Chapter 5: City of Everett Shoreline Management Plan 12 <br /> I 5.1 Policies and Regulations for Urban Industrial Shorelines 12 <br /> 5.2 Project Compliance 15 <br /> Chapter 6. Species Information 16 <br /> I Chapter 7. Project Effects on ESA-Listed Species 18 <br /> 7.1 Direct and Indirect Effects 18 <br /> 7.2 Short-term Effects 18 <br /> I 7.3 Long-term Effects 18 <br /> 7.4 Determinations of Effect 19 <br /> Chapter 8. Report Summary 25 <br /> IChapter 9. References 26 <br /> Figures <br /> Figure 1: Vicinity Map 3 <br /> IFigure 2:Terrestrial Attenuation for Hard Sites 6 <br /> Figure 3: Aerial Photo of the Site 9 <br /> I <br /> Tables <br /> I Table 1: Determination of Effects for ESA Species ii <br /> Table 2: Determination of Critical Habitat Effects for ESA Species ii <br /> Table 3:Terrestrial Noise Attenuation 5 <br /> ITable 4: ESA Listed Species Potentially Found in the Vicinity of the Action 16 <br /> Table 5: Critical Habitat in the Vicinity of the Action Area 17 <br /> I Table 6: Species Determination Summary 19 <br /> Table 7: Critical Habitat Determination Summary 20 <br /> I <br /> Soundview Consultants LLC iii December 8,2016 <br /> I1413.0003 Riverside Business Park—FEMA ESA Biological Assessment Report <br />