Laserfiche WebLink
To be eligible for its architectural merits under Criterion (c), a resource must <br />retain its physical features that constitute a significant construction technique or <br />architectural style. Critical aspects of integrity for such properties are design, <br />workmanship, and materials. Location and setting will also be important for <br />those resources whose design reflects their immediate environment. <br />Resources significant under Criterion (d) may not have the type of integrity <br />described under the other criterion. Of the seven aspects of integrity, location, <br />design, materials, and possibly workmanship are the most important. <br />Archaeological Expectations <br />Soils and Geomorphological Context <br />Given the presence of mapped soils indicative of ancient glacial till terrace (Alderwood and <br />Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loam), primary soil deposition in this location, which is sterile <br />glacial till, would have occurred long before human habitation. Some post -glacial shallow soil within <br />the forest and wetland environment of the terrace cover the glacial till and might contain evidence of <br />patterned human behavior, including expressions of episodes of resource gathering and/or <br />processing, travel or short-term/single-use camp sites represented by lithic scatters, and/or small <br />concentrations of fire -modified rocks (FMR). The absence of recorded trail systems and/or <br />freshwater sources in the terrace uplands make the project area an unlikely location for any of these <br />types of resources. As indicated in Table 1, from 5,000 years ago to the early contact period large <br />village occupation sites generally occurred in lowland areas, were associated with fish weirs, and <br />were typically located adjacent to or near river or marine transportation routes. Occupation of <br />upland terrace locations would most likely have occurred 15,000-5,000 years ago; these sites are <br />represented by temporary camps and lithic workshops. Expected artifact assemblages would include <br />flaked stone tools, cobble tools, large -animal bones, and fish bones. <br />Anaerobic conditions in wetlands often provide good preservation of cellulose and other plant fibers <br />(Diedrich 2013). However, soil pH' is a better indicator of whether or not an area is preservative for <br />other organic materials, such as bone or shell. According to Deborah Surabian (2011:4): <br />The pH of soil has the largest influence on bone preservation, with preservation <br />' generally advantageous in soils above pH 5.3 and adverse in soils pH 5.3 or less. Soils <br />containing a highly acidic pH will decompose bone rapidly ... If the soil is neutral or <br />basic, a buried skeleton may persist for centuries in good condition. In a corrosive <br />' soil environment, it is clear that, irrespective of taphonomy, the outcome will be the <br />same: catastrophic mineral dissolution. <br />' The potentially artifact -bearing soils consist of a very shallow layer of soil that would have provided <br />little protection for cultural deposits, if any were present. Additionally, the glacially derived soils <br />mapped in the project area would poorly preserve organic materials, as soil conditions are not <br />' anaerobic and the soil pH values range from strongly to moderately acidic. The hydric soils mapped <br />in the central and southeastern portion of the APE, while likely to present anaerobic conditions, are <br />moderately acidic in the upper layers and slightly acidic in the deeper layers. This means that <br />I A pH less than 7 is acidic and a pH greater than 7 is basic or alkaline. <br />Tierra Archaeological Report No. 2014-077 17 <br />