Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <br /> I <br /> 1: Seaway Boulevard & 75th Street SW 3/19/2015 <br /> IMovement Etas EA WBL WBT WOR NSL NBT NBR Sal SST SE1R <br /> Lane Configurations 'VI tt r vi 41, iin fts )1 41, <br /> Volume(vph) 22 19 39 174 78 111 843 1572 289 18 173 55 <br /> I <br /> Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 <br /> Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 <br /> Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 <br /> I <br /> Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 <br /> Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 <br /> Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 <br /> Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 <br /> I <br /> Satd.Flow(prot) 3502 2344 1615 1117 2566 3502 3338 2084 3352 <br /> Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 <br /> Satd.Flow(perm) 3502 2344 1615 1117 2566 3502 3338 2084 3352 <br /> I <br /> Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 <br /> Adj.Flow(vph) 24 21 42 189 85 121 916 1709 314 20 188 60 <br /> RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 6 0 0 16 0 <br /> Lane Group Flow(vph) 24 21 42 136 158 0 916 2017 0 20 232 0 <br /> I <br /> Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 105 103 <br /> Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 54% 0% 47% 3% 6% 0% 1% 11% 68% 5% 0% <br /> Turn Type Split NA Free Split NA Prot NA Prot NA <br /> ' Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 <br /> Permitted Phases Free <br /> Actuated Green,G(s) 5.0 5.0 133.4 20.7 20.7 35.2 75.6 13.1 53.5 <br /> I <br /> Effective Green,g(s) 5.0 5.0 133.4 20.7 20.7 35.2 75.6 13.1 53.5 <br /> Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.04 1.00 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.57 0.10 0.40 <br /> Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 <br /> Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 <br /> I Lane Grp Cap(vph) 131 88 1615 173 398 924 1892 205 1344 <br /> v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.01 c0.12 0.06 0.26 c0.60 0.01 c0.07 <br /> v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 <br /> v/c Ratio 0.18 0.24 0.03 0.79 0.40 0.99 1.07 0.10 0.17 <br /> I <br /> Uniform Delay,dl 62.2 62.4 0.0 54.2 50.7 48.9 28.9 54.8 25.7 <br /> Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 <br /> Incremental Delay,d2 0.2 0.5 0.0 20.5 0.7 27.6 41.0 0.1 0.3 <br /> I <br /> Delay(s)Level of Service 62.5 62.9 0.0 74.8 51.4 76.5 69.9 54.8 26.0 <br /> E E A E D E E D C <br /> Approach Delay(s) 32.4 59.4 71.9 28.1 <br /> Approach LOS C E E C <br /> IIntersection Summary <br /> HCM Average Control Delay 66.5 HCM Level of Service E <br /> I <br /> HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 <br /> Actuated Cycle Length(s) 133.4 Sum of lost time(s) 14.0 <br /> Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.5% ICU Level of Service E <br /> Analysis Period(min) 15 <br /> I <br /> c Critical Lane Group <br /> I <br /> Existing Conditions 3/13/2015 Build Synchro 8 Report <br /> IB. Powell Page 1 <br /> I <br />