My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
101 E MARINE VIEW DR SEPA 018 - 011 Geotech Report 2025-04-15
>
Address Records
>
E MARINE VIEW DR
>
101
>
SEPA 018 - 011
>
Geotech Report
>
101 E MARINE VIEW DR SEPA 018 - 011 Geotech Report 2025-04-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:55:44 PM
Creation date
4/15/2025 2:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
E MARINE VIEW DR
Street Number
101
Tenant Name
SEPA 018 - 011
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 988017 <br /> East Marine View Drive Warehouse May 19,2017 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 6 <br /> For planning purposes,we recommend that temporary cuts above the water table in the on-site soils be no <br /> steeper than 3 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (3H:1 V) if worker access is necessary. Cuts below the water table <br /> should be shored. We recommend that cut slopes be protected from erosion. These erosion protection <br /> measures may include covering cut slopes with plastic sheeting and diverting surface runoff away from <br /> the top of cut slopes. We do not recommend vertical slopes for cuts deeper than four feet, if worker <br /> access is necessary. We recommend that cut slope heights and inclinations conform to appropriate <br /> OSHA/WISHA regulations. <br /> Site Preparation and Grading <br /> After erosion control measures are implemented site preparation should consist of removing all <br /> remanence of the burnt down warehouse and all pavement surfaces. The stripped material should be <br /> removed from the site. Due to the proposed structure being supported on compacted rock aggregate piers, <br /> we would anticipate minimal depth excavations throughout the proposed building area but the resulting <br /> subgrade should be compacted to a firm surface state. <br /> If the ground surface, after site stripping, should appear to be loose, it should be compacted to a non- <br /> yielding condition and then proof-rolled with a heavy rubber-tired piece of equipment. Areas observed to <br /> pump or weave during the proof-roll test should be reworked to structural fill specifications or over- <br /> excavated and replaced with properly compacted structural fill or rock spalls. If soft soils are encountered <br /> in the building or pavement areas, these areas should be removed and replaced with rock spalls or <br /> granular structural fill. If significant surface water flow is encountered during construction, this flow <br /> should be diverted around areas to be developed, and the exposed subgrades should be maintained in a <br /> semi-dry condition. <br /> If wet conditions are encountered, alternative site stripping and grading techniques might be necessary. <br /> These could include using large excavators equipped with wide tracks and a smooth bucket to complete <br /> site grading and covering exposed subgrade with a layer of crushed rock for protection. If wet conditions <br /> are encountered or construction is attempted in wet weather,the subgrade should not be compacted as this <br /> could cause further subgrade disturbance. In wet conditions it may be necessary to cover the exposed <br /> subgrade with a layer of crushed rock as soon as it is exposed to protect the moisture sensitive soils from <br /> disturbance by machine or foot traffic during construction. The prepared subgrade should be protected <br /> from construction traffic and surface water should be diverted around prepared subgrade. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.