My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7800 EVERGREEN WAY HYUNDAI Drainage Report 2025-04-28
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
7800
>
HYUNDAI
>
Drainage Report
>
7800 EVERGREEN WAY HYUNDAI Drainage Report 2025-04-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 2:44:55 PM
Creation date
4/28/2025 2:43:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
7800
Tenant Name
HYUNDAI
Address Document Type
Drainage Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conservatively, the R-tank full-infiltration system has been equipped with an emergency overflow for flows <br /> exceeding the targets of the DOE Manual flow control performance standard. The R-tank overflow connects to <br /> the existing municipal system downstream in Evergreen Way. <br /> Refer to Appendix B for flow control calculations of both systems using MGSFlood. <br /> 5. Conveyance <br /> The proposed conveyance system for the entire site is designed to convey the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event <br /> without overtopping. The drainage capacity analysis is based on the following assumptions: <br /> 1. Peak flow rates are calculated from hydrology model MGSFlood. See Figure 5-1 for screenshot of peak <br /> flow results and see Appendix C for full MGSFlood conveyance output.As a conservative, worst-case <br /> scenario, the existing undetained, fully impervious roof area is used for calculating peak flow rates. <br /> 2. Pipe capacity is calculated using the Manning Equation in StormShed 3G for full flow capacity analysis. <br /> As a conservative, worst-case scenario, the smallest, minimum-slope pipe is examined. <br /> See Figures 5-1 and 5-2 for comparison showing the capacity of the smallest, minimum-slope pipe exceeds <br /> the peak flow generated from the existing undetained, fully impervious roof area. <br /> *** Point of Compliance Flow Frequency Data *** <br /> Recurrence Interval Computed Using Gringorten Plotting Position <br /> Predevelopment Runoff Postdevelopment Runoff <br /> Tr(Years) Discharge (cfs) Tr(Years) Discharge (cfs) <br /> 2-Year 4.034E-03 2-Year 7.480E-02 <br /> 5-Year 6.399E-03 5-Year 9.577E-02 <br /> 10-Year 8.270E-03 10-Year 0.111 <br /> 25-Year 1.075E-02 25-Year 0.142 <br /> 50-Year 1.186E-02 50-Year 0.178 <br /> 100-Year 1.353E-02 100-Year 0.213 <br /> 200-Year 1.866E-02 200-Year 0.225 <br /> 500-Year 2.556E-02 500-Year 0.241 <br /> ** Record too Short to Compute Peak Discharge for These Recurrence Intervals <br /> Figure 5-1: MGSFlood Peak Flow Results <br /> LMJ Hyundai—Showroom Remodel <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.