My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2424-99
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2424-99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 3:31:22 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 3:31:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2424-99
Date
11/29/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 6: Option to prepare traffic analysis <br /> In order to allow the impact fee to be adjusted to consider unusual circumstances in <br /> specific cases to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly or to calculate an adjustment in the <br /> standard fee for a particular development that permits consideration of studies and data <br /> submitted by the applicant, the applicant has the option of preparing a traffic analysis at its <br /> expense to provide a basis for an adjustment in the standard fee. The traffic analysis shall meet <br /> the specifications for a traffic analysis provided in Sections 6 through 8 of TMO or as otherwise <br /> approved by the City Engineer. <br /> Section 7: Administrative procedures and appeals <br /> 7.1. RCW 82.02.070 and 82.02.080 are hereby adopted by reference into this chapter as the <br /> administrative procedures for collection and refunding of impact fees under this chapter. <br /> 7.2. Payment of all fees shall be made prior to: <br /> 1. Final plat approval in the case of subdivisions and short subdivisions; or <br /> 2. In all other cases,be prior to the issuance of any building permits. <br /> 7.3. All fees collected under this ordinance shall be obligated or expended on public facilities <br /> that are addressed by an adopted capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan. <br /> If fees are earmarked for a specific project, and the City determines that it is not feasible to <br /> implement that project within six (6) years (or such other time period established pursuant to <br /> RCW 82.02.070(3) on public facilities intended to benefit the development activity for which the <br /> impact fees were paid), the fees may be expended or encumbered on a replacement project that <br /> provides similar or greater improvement to the transportation system. <br /> 7.3. The City Engineer or designee shall be the official responsible for preparing the annual <br /> reports required under RCW 82.02.070. <br /> 7.4. An applicant's commitment to specific performance to construct a transportation <br /> improvement, including any bonds or financial assurance associated with the improvement, shall <br /> not be considered a fee under this ordinance, regardless of whether a monetary value has been <br /> assigned to the improvement in the traffic analysis or other project review documents or <br /> agreements. <br /> 7.5. An applicant may appeal the City Engineer's determination of the impact fee required <br /> under this chapter by following the administrative appeal procedures for the underlying <br /> development approval. If there are no administrative appeal procedures for the underlying <br /> development approval, the appeal shall follow the administrative appeal procedures in EMC <br /> 15.20.010 for the appeal of minor administration decisions. <br /> Section 8: Application to projects currently underway <br /> -3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.