My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
417 TAMARACK AVE 2025-08-19
>
Address Records
>
TAMARACK AVE
>
417
>
417 TAMARACK AVE 2025-08-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2025 1:07:28 PM
Creation date
5/30/2025 8:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TAMARACK AVE
Street Number
417
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BMP and <br />Infeasibility description <br />applicable lists <br />Infeasibility criteria <br />and rationale for each <br />BMP not selected <br />T5.30 <br />❑ Site setbacks and design criteria provided in BMP T5.30 <br />No 100' flow path. <br />Full Dispersion <br />(SWMMWW, Section V-4.1) cannot be achieved. <br />to10ratio <br />0 A 65 to 10 ratio of forested or native vegetation area to impervious <br />cannot <br />Cabe <br />area cannot be achieved. <br />achieved. <br />10 A minimum forested or native vegetation flowpath length of 100 <br />feet (25 feet for sheet flow from a non-native pervious surface) <br />cannot be achieved. <br />T5.15 <br />Citation of any of the following infeasibility criteria must be based on <br />Site contains fill <br />Permeable <br />an evaluation of site -specific conditions and a written <br />Pavement <br />recommendation from an appropriate licensed professional (e.g., <br />underlain by <br />engineer, geologist, hydrogeologist): <br />shallow <br />10 Where professional geotechnical evaluation recommends <br />compacted soil <br />infiltration not be used due to reasonable concerns about erosion, <br />(Glacial Till). See <br />slope failure, or downgradient flooding. <br />geotech report <br />❑ Within an area whose ground water drains into an erosion hazard, <br />or landslide hazard area. <br />❑ Where infiltrating and ponded water below the new permeable <br />pavement area would compromise adjacent impervious <br />pavements. <br />❑ Where infiltrating water below a new permeable pavement area <br />would threaten existing below grade basements. <br />❑ Where infiltrating water would threaten shoreline structures such <br />as bulkheads. <br />❑ Down slope of steep, erosion prone areas that are likely to deliver <br />sediment. <br />0 Where fill soils are used that can become unstable when saturated. <br />❑ Excessively steep slopes where water within the aggregate base <br />layer or at the subgrade surface cannot be controlled by detention <br />structures and may cause erosion and structural failure, or where <br />surface runoff velocities may preclude adequate infiltration at the <br />pavement surface. <br />❑ Where permeable pavements cannot provide sufficient strength to <br />support heavy loads at industrial facilities such as ports. <br />❑ Where installation of permeable pavement would threaten the <br />safety or reliability of pre-existing underground utilities, pre- <br />existing underground storage tanks, or pre-existing road <br />subgrades. <br />City of Everett Public Works <br />Small Project Stormwater Site Plan Report -Dec 2019 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.