5010 DOVER ST 2025-07-31 - Laserfiche WebLink

Drew Martin From: Drew Martin Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 9:08 AM To: AFABELLA@SPIRITSOFTWARE.BIZ Subject: City of Everett Permit Services: 5010 Dover Street (B2204-003) - Second Building Review Hello, Anne. We are contacting you as it appears that the design team for this project has changed, including the applicant. Please contact our Permit Desk to review the contact information for this project as needed. We have completed the second review of the building plans for this project. This email will serve as the review letter. The comments below should be addressed. Two revised full-sized hard -copies of the drawings should be submitted for review. An itemized response letter stating how each comment has been addressed should be included with the drawing. Additional revised documentation, including but not limited structural calculations and other supporting documentation, should be submitted as required. Comments General: 1. The submitted documents appear intended to completely replace the previously submitted documents. The new documents are incomplete, including but not limited to insufficient architectural drawings (i.e., only one sheet provided) and no structural drawings. Complete drawings and calculations for the new design should be submitted for review. The documents provided by the previous design team are not consistent with the new design and cannot be collated with documents prepared by the new design team. Additional comments may be issued pending review of the complete submittal documents. Architectural: The architectural and structural drawings are not consistent. Based on mark-ups by the designer on Sheet A3, it appears that the structural drawings provide the more accurate proposed design. The drawings should be coordinated for consistency. See IRC Section R106.1.1. Structural: The structural design appears to be engineered per IRC Section R401.1.3. Structural calculations should be submitted substantiating the design. The calculations should include all parts of the structure, including but not limited to the foundations, shear walls and holdowns, and gravity framing. See IBC Sections 1604.1 and 1604.4, and additional comments below. 4. The continuous foundations appear to have reduced in size versus the original design. The foundation design should verify the bearing pressures, including combinations with seismic loading. In addition, the foundation design should specify the minimum required embedment depth, which should not be less than the greater of that required by the geotechnical report for the site conditions or the 18 inch frost depth. The Main Floor beam on the west side supports a discontinuous shear wall. The beam is required to be design for load combinations with seismic forces increased by overstrength. See IBC Section 1613.1 and ASCE 7-16 Section 12.3.3.3.