Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Page 12 <br />Everett 2044 Housing Element Appendix <br />Category 2: Sensitfve informatfon <br />compete in the housing market. Incomes for these communitfes have grown in absolute terms, but the <br />persistent wage gap limits housing choices and increases risk of displacement. At the same tfme, the <br />modest gains in homeownership among non-white households have not kept pace with the overall rise <br />in property values, reducing the wealth-building potentfal of homeownership for these groups. <br />The data also show a growing divergence between renters and owners in terms of income. In 2023, the <br />average income of owner households was substantfally higher than that of renters, reflectfng both <br />longstanding patterns of income stratfficatfon and the impact of rising housing prices in locking lower- <br />income residents out of ownership opportunitfes. While homeownership brings financial stability and <br />equity accumulatfon, most renters—especially those in younger age brackets or from historically <br />marginalized communitfes—are unable to make that leap. Even modest starter homes are increasingly <br />priced out of reach for middle-income earners, despite overall wage growth. <br />This disconnect between earnings and housing access underscores the need for housing policy that goes <br />beyond unit counts and square footage. Everett must contfnue to grow its housing supply, but it must <br />also focus on aligning housing prices with what residents actually earn. This means deepening <br />affordability at the lower end of the market, expanding subsidized housing, and using income-based <br />metrics to guide zoning, financing, and development decisions. <br />Equity in housing cannot be achieved through market forces alone. Without deliberate policies that <br />bridge the income-housing gap, Everett’s gains in income and employment will contfnue to benefit only a <br />portfon of the populatfon—leaving many behind in a market they helped build but can no longer afford <br />to live in. <br />High and Rising Housing Cost Burdens <br />Over the last decade, the weight of housing costs in Everett has steadily increased, placing growing <br />pressure on both renters and homeowners. What began as a gradual rise in expenses has now become a <br />structural crisis—one where a significant share of households spend far more than they can afford just to <br />keep a roof over their heads. Cost burden is not just a statfstfc; it’s a daily reality shaping what families <br />can afford to eat, how they care for their children, and whether they can save for the future or remain in <br />their communitfes at all. <br />A household is considered cost-burdened if it spends more than 30% of its income on housing, and <br />severely cost-burdened if that share exceeds 50%. In Everett, both categories have grown alarmingly. <br />Among renters, cost burden is now the norm, not the exceptfon. In 2023, 58.4% of all renter households <br />were cost-burdened—up from 48.9% in 2010. Even more striking, nearly 30% of renters in Everett were <br />severely cost-burdened in 2023, a sharp increase from 23.8% just thirteen years earlier. These numbers <br />reflect the city’s surging rents and the increasingly limited supply of affordable housing, partfcularly for <br />those earning below the median income. <br />Homeowners, while somewhat more stable, are far from immune. In 2023, 33.1% of mortgage-holding <br />homeowners were cost-burdened, and 11.5% were severely burdened. Although these percentages have <br />declined slightly from their post-recession peaks in the early 2010s, they have tfcked back up in recent <br />years as housing prices and interest rates have both climbed. From 2021 to 2023 alone, the number of <br />mortgage households spending more than half their income on housing rose from 1,452 to 1,814. Even <br />as some homeowners benefit from rising equity, many newer buyers face monthly costs that stretch <br />their budgets thin. <br />What’s partfcularly concerning is the breadth of households affected. Cost burden is not confined to a <br />single demographic group—it cuts across age, race, and household type. Young adults, seniors on fixed <br />incomes, families with children, and single working adults are all represented among the city’s cost-