My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 4101-25
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 4101-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2025 3:28:15 PM
Creation date
6/24/2025 3:16:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
4101-25
Date
6/18/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
429
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 23 <br />Everett 2044 Housing Element Appendix <br />Category 2: Sensitfve informatfon <br /> <br />Source: US Housing and Urban Development, 2017-2021 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (Table 9) <br />Assessing disparate impacts requires looking beyond city-wide averages to understand how different <br />racial and ethnic groups experience housing cost burden. Under HUD’s Consolidated Planning regulatfons <br />(24 CFR 91.205(b)(2)), a group is considered to have a “disproportfonately greater need” if its combined <br />moderate and severe cost-burden rate exceeds the jurisdictfon’s overall rate by at least ten percentage <br />points. In Everett, the overall cost-burden rate for all households in 2017–2021 was 38 percent (Table 9, <br />CHAS 2017–2021). <br />As shown in Chart 1 below, cost-burden rates vary markedly across racial and ethnic groups: <br />• Asian alone, non-Hispanic households had the lowest cost-burden rate at 36 percent, just below <br />the city average. <br />• White alone, non-Hispanic households experienced a 34 percent cost-burden rate, four points <br />below the city-wide rate. <br />• Black or African American alone, non-Hispanic households faced a 47 percent rate, nine points <br />above the average but just shy of the ten-point “disproportfonate need” threshold. <br />• Hispanic or Latfno (of any race) households had a 59 percent cost-burden rate—21 points above <br />the overall rate—clearly qualifying as a group with disproportfonately greater need. <br />• American Indian or Alaska Natfve alone, non-Hispanic households showed a 52 percent rate, 14 <br />points above the average, also indicatfng a disproportfonately greater need. <br />• All persons of color combined experienced a 46 percent cost-burden rate, eight points above the <br />city-wide figure. <br /> <br />62% <br />63% <br />100% <br />41% <br />65% <br />63% <br />73% <br />19% <br />20% <br />0% <br />32% <br />16% <br />27% <br />11% <br />17% <br />16% <br />0% <br />25% <br />19% <br />9% <br />3% <br />0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% <br />Other (including multiple races, non-Hispanic) <br />White alone, non-Hispanic <br />Pacific Islander alone, non-Hispanic <br />Hispanic, any race <br />Black or African-American alone, non-Hispanic <br />Asian alone, non-Hispanic <br />American Indian or Alaska Native alone, non-Hispanic <br />Chart 1: Percent of all Households Experiencing Housing Cost Burden <br />by Racial Ethnic Group, 5-Year Average (2017-2021) <br />Not Cost-Burdened (≤30%)Cost-Burdened (>30% but ≤50%)Severely Cost-Burdened (>50%)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.