Laserfiche WebLink
Kierstein Residence Retaining Wall <br /> Everett, Washington Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> provided to us, the sloping area where the planned retaining wall replacement project will be <br /> located is greater than 40 percent. Observations were made of the slopes at the time of our <br /> subsurface exploration in April 2019. We observed that both of the existing segmental block <br /> retaining walls exhibit indications of past landslide movements. Portions of both walls are out <br /> of alignment from their presumed original straight and near vertical arrangement. The <br /> lowermost western wall exhibits a greater amount of deflection than the uppermost eastern <br /> wall. AESI observed a tension crack in the lawn area about 5 to 10 feet east of the upper wall <br /> during a prior site visit. Localized hummocky topography and slight bulging of the ground <br /> surface were observed directly down slope of the lowermost wall. Additionally, one of the <br /> evergreen trees situated within a few feet of the toe of the lowermost wall appeared to be <br /> slightly back rotated. We understand that the lower wall failed in early 2022. No groundwater <br /> seepage was observed at the time of our field studies. <br /> Slope Stability Assessment <br /> Based on the observed surface and subsurface conditions at the site as described above, it is <br /> AESI's opinion that the landslide movements that have affected the existing segmental block <br /> retaining walls likely occurred as a result of elevated groundwater within the existing loose fill <br /> and weathered native soils that are present behind the walls and below the base of the existing <br /> walls. The existing walls appear to have been founded on loose subgrade soils and without <br /> subsurface drainage to collect subsurface groundwater. <br /> The replacement retaining wall will need to be founded on suitable foundation bearing soils, <br /> have surface water controls to limit surface water infiltration behind the new wall, and <br /> subsurface wall drainage to prevent a rise in groundwater in the wall backfill as described in this <br /> report. It is AESI's opinion that the new wall designed and constructed in conformance with our <br /> recommendations will present a low risk of damage to the subject site under either static or <br /> seismic conditions. <br /> EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS <br /> Project plans should include implementation of temporary erosion controls in accordance with <br /> local standards of practice. Control methods should include limiting earthwork to seasonally <br /> drier periods, typically April 1 to October 31, use of perimeter silt fences, and straw mulch in <br /> exposed areas. Removal of existing vegetation should be limited to those areas that are <br /> required to construct the project, and new landscaping and vegetation with equivalent erosion <br /> mitigation potential should be established as soon as possible after grading is complete. During <br /> construction, surface water should be collected as close as possible to the source to minimize <br /> silt entrainment that could require treatment or detention prior to discharge. Timely <br /> implementation of permanent drainage control measures should also be a part of the project <br /> plans, and will help reduce erosion and generation of silty surface water onsite. <br /> July 1, 2022 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES,INC. <br /> SASlih-20180614EO01-002 Page 5 <br />