Laserfiche WebLink
From: Adam Clark <br /> To: Clint Johnson <br /> Subject: FW:B2402-040 Re-Review for New Doorways <br /> Date: Monday,July 8,2024 2:47:39 PM <br /> Attachments: Greenshields Plan Set 241018.odf <br /> imaae001.ona <br /> imaae003.ona <br /> From:Adam Clark <br /> Sent: Friday,June 28, 2024 2:39 PM <br /> To:Ben Monk<BMonk@everettwa.gov> <br /> Cc:Trevor Murphy<trevor@gshields.com> <br /> Subject: RE: B2402-040 Re-Review for New Doorways <br /> Ben, <br /> I will see what I can do to get this engineer to respond accordingly. I know it will be a challenge <br /> due to prior attempts to get him to respond as we typically do and as you have noted.Sounds <br /> like all of the architectural information is correct(note that the door hardware is called out in <br /> the note on drawing A1). I did not feel a full door schedule was warranted to cover these two <br /> doors.The remaining corrections are related to the structural drawings. I will see what I can do <br /> to get them to respond accordingly. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Adam <br /> From:Ben Monk<R^^onL@_QYerettwa.gov> <br /> Sent: Friday,June 28, 2024 2:25 PM <br /> To:Adam Clark<Adam(@2812architecture.com> <br /> Subject: B2402-040 Re-Review for New Doorways <br /> Category 2:Sensitive information <br /> Dear Adam, <br /> I am reaching out to update you on the permit submittal status for the responses provided for <br /> building permit#B2402-040 for the new doorways. I am sorry to hear that the engineer has not <br /> been willing to respond to the comment letter; however,the drawings we received appear to have <br /> the exact same notes,details,and code references as before. I have taken another look and <br /> attempted to add more specific language to the comments that have not been addressed to help aid <br /> in any confusion—expanding/adding to comments where necessary.An itemized response to the <br /> comment letter indicating how the comments were addressed is required for permit issuance. <br /> General: <br />