My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
200 W MARINE VIEW DR Geotech Report 2025-08-07
>
Address Records
>
W MARINE VIEW DR
>
200
>
Geotech Report
>
200 W MARINE VIEW DR Geotech Report 2025-08-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2025 2:03:47 PM
Creation date
7/24/2025 2:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MARINE VIEW DR
Street Number
200
Permit
PW2011-021
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 16,2020 <br /> Project No. T-8221 <br /> The preceding discussion is intended to be a brief review of the soil conditions observed at the site. More detailed <br /> descriptions of the subsurface conditions are summarized on the CPT Logs attached in Appendix A. Logs of test <br /> borings and test pits advanced at the site by others are provided in Appendix C. The approximate locations of the <br /> CPTs and test borings/test pits by others are shown on Figure 2. <br /> 3.3 Groundwater <br /> Dissipation tests at CPT-2 through CPT-4 indicate hydrostatic groundwater levels ranging from five to ten feet <br /> below existing grades at those locations. Groundwater levels would be expected to be higher during late winter to <br /> early spring(January through April)and highly influenced by tidal variations. <br /> 4.0 SEISMIC <br /> Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in <br /> water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of fine-grained sands <br /> underlying the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. The <br /> generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this intergranular <br /> friction;thus, eliminating the soil's strength. <br /> We completed a liquefaction analysis using the computer program LiquefyPro published by CivilTech Corporation. <br /> The analysis was completed using a PGAM of.46 and a magnitude 7 earthquake. This PGAM represents acceleration <br /> for the maximum considered event(MCE)which is an earthquake having a 2 percent probability of exceedance in <br /> 50 years. The value was obtained from the Structural Engineers Association of California(SEAOC)U.S. Seismic <br /> Design Maps web site (https://seismicmaps.org_n accessed on September 20, 2019. The results of the liquefaction <br /> analysis are attached in Appendix B. <br /> The results of our analysis indicate soil liquefaction could occur during the design earthquake event. Analysis <br /> indicates that liquefaction could result in total settlements approaching four to seven inches, one-half of which <br /> would likely be differential in nature. In our opinion, this amount of settlement would not structurally impair the <br /> building. However, cosmetic damage to the structure in the form of misaligned doors and windows, cracking, and <br /> floor settlement could occur. If the owner is not willing to accept the risk of building damage requiring repair <br /> should liquefaction induced settlements occur, foundations should be supported on ground improved using stone <br /> columns designed to mitigate soil liquefaction settlements below the building foundations or on piles. <br /> The potential for lateral spreading to occur during a design level seismic event was evaluated by performing a <br /> Newmark analysis using the RocScience SLIDE program. Post liquefaction residual strengths were assigned to the <br /> lower sand layer below the groundwater table that are shown to liquefy during the design earthquake. The residual <br /> strengths were assigned using the average correlated standard penetration test "N" values determined at CPT-02 <br /> with Seed and Harder 1990. Ground motion used in the analysis was the seismic record for the 1995 Kobe Japan <br /> earthquake. This record was selected because it had a PGA of.5 which nearly matches the PGAM for the site. A <br /> summary printout of the SLIDE Newmark analysis is also included in Appendix B. <br /> Page No. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.