Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation lierracon <br /> Broadway& 10th Starbucks = Everett,WA <br /> January 9, 2014 = Terracon Project No. 81135080 <br /> Crushed Aggregate Base: We recommend that all CAB material conform to the criteria for <br /> "Crushed Surfacing Base Course" per WSDOT: 9-03.9(3). In the interest of using recycled <br /> materials from on-site or off-site sources, it would be acceptable to substitute up to 20 percent <br /> of the CAB with crushed cement concrete, provided that the final mixture meets the same <br /> textural criteria as the aforementioned WSDOT material. Regardless of composition, all CAB <br /> material should be compacted to a minimum density of 95 percent, based on the Modified <br /> Proctor maximum dry density (per ASTM: D-1557). <br /> Asphalt Concrete Pavement: We recommend that the ACP aggregate gradation conform to <br /> the control points for a '/2-inch mix (per WSDOT: 9-03.8(6)) and that the binder conform to PG <br /> 58-22 criteria (per WSDOT: 9-02.1(4)). We also recommend that the ACP be compacted to a <br /> target average density of 92 percent, with no individual locations compacted to less than 90 <br /> percent nor more than 96 percent, based on the Rice theoretical maximum density for that <br /> material (per ASTM: D-2041). <br /> Cement Concrete Pavement: We recommend using Portland cement concrete with a <br /> minimum compressive strength of 4,000 psi and a minimum rupture modulus of 580 for the <br /> CCP. We also recommend that the concrete be reinforced with a welded wire mesh such as <br /> W2-6x6, positioned at a one-third depth within the layer. <br /> Compaction Testing: Compaction of the CAB and GSB layers should be verified qualitatively <br /> by method observations, proof-rolling, and hand-probing, as well as quantitatively by nuclear <br /> densometer testing. Compaction of the ACP should be quantified by laboratory testing of core <br /> samples, along with in-situ nuclear densometer testing. <br /> Pavement Life and Maintenance: It should be realized that asphaltic pavements are not <br /> maintenance-free. The foregoing pavement sections represent our minimum recommendations <br /> for an average level of performance during a 20-year design life; therefore, an average level of <br /> maintenance will likely be required. Furthermore, a 20-year pavement life typically assumes <br /> that an overlay will be placed after about 10 years. Thicker asphalt, base, and subbase <br /> courses would offer better long-term performance, but would cost more initially; thinner courses <br /> would be more susceptible to "alligator" cracking and other failure modes. As such, pavement <br /> design can be considered a compromise between a high initial cost and low maintenance costs <br /> versus a low initial cost and higher maintenance costs. <br /> The minimum pavement sections outlined above were determined based on the laboratory test <br /> results and post-construction traffic loading conditions. These pavement sections do not <br /> account for heavy construction traffic during development. A partially constructed structural <br /> section may be subjected to heavy construction traffic that can result in pavement deterioration <br /> and premature failure. Our experience indicates that this pavement construction practice can <br /> result in pavements that will not perform as intended. Considering this information, several <br /> alternatives are available to mitigate the impact of heavy construction traffic on the pavement. <br /> Reliable 0 Responsive a Convenient a Innovative 13 <br />