Laserfiche WebLink
KA No.092-12004 <br /> August 24,2012 <br /> Page No. 5 <br /> Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by <br /> soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high groundwater table. The <br /> native soils consisting of medium dense to very dense silty sand with gravel interpreted to underlie the <br /> site are considered to have a low potential for liquefaction and amplification of ground motion. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> General <br /> It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the site is compatible with the planned development, <br /> provided that our recommendations are incorporated into project plans and are implemented during <br /> construction. Our subsurface explorations generally encountered a variable amount of undocumented <br /> fill and organic material overlying medium dense to very dense native soils. In general, medium dense <br /> to very dense native soils were encountered near the surface in the eastern portion of the site, and at a <br /> depth of approximately 10 feet in the western portion of the property. In our opinion, the medium dense <br /> to very dense native soils should provide adequate support for foundations,slabs,and pavement. <br /> We recommend that foundations be supported on the underlying medium dense or better native soils. <br /> This could be achieved by means of removing the unsuitable materials in planned footing areas and <br /> replacing with structural fill. Alternatively, the foundations could be supported by piling that extends <br /> through the soft soils and into the underlying dense to very dense native soils. <br /> If some settlement, cracking and maintenance of the slab is acceptable for this project, then the slab <br /> could be supported on at least one foot of granular structural fill placed over the variable amounts of <br /> undocumented fill and organic materials underlying the site. If settlement, cracking and maintenance of <br /> the slab is not acceptable for this project, then the unsuitable soils should be removed to expose the <br /> competent medium dense or firmer native soil and structural fill should be placed to support the slab. <br /> Alternatively, the slab could be supported on piling. The pavement section should be constructed on <br /> native soil or on a layer of Mirafi 600X or equivalent geotextile and at least one foot of structural fill. <br /> The soils encountered in our explorations on site are generally considered to be moisture-sensitive. Silty <br /> soils typically do not perform well when wet. The non-organic on-site soils could be used as structural <br /> fill provided the moisture content is near optimum and they could be suitably compacted to project <br /> specifications. This will depend on the moisture content of the soils at the time of construction. <br /> Construction during extended periods of wet weather could result in the need to remove wet disturbed <br /> soils and import all-weather materials, resulting in greater project expenses. Krazan and Associates is <br /> available on request to evaluate the suitability of the on-site soils for use as structural fill material at the <br /> time of construction. <br /> Krazan&Associates,Inc. <br /> Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States <br />