Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Jackson's aka PacWest Energy LLC JN 13465 <br /> ' December 9, 2013 Page 3 <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' GENERAL <br /> ' THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND.FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A <br /> GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE <br /> CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD <br /> READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. <br /> The test borings conducted for this study encountered loose fill that extended to depths of up to <br /> about 5 feet in the planned convenience store location. These fill materials are not suitable for <br /> support of the planned convenience store. Excessive differential settlement would result if the <br /> footings are not excavated through the fill. The structure's foundations should extend to the <br /> medium-dense silty sand with gravel encountered below the fill. This includes "thickened edge" <br /> slabs, which really Just shallow footing. The explorations in the vicinity of the planned canopy in the <br /> west central portion of the site encountered native medium-dense soil at shallow depths. <br /> ' Where overexcavation below planned footing grades is necessary either the footings can be <br /> extended downward or the overexcavation could be backfilled with structural fill. This is discussed <br /> in Conventional Footings. <br /> ' The proposed convenience store location partially overlies the area of the existing USTs. When <br /> these USTs are removed, placement of structural fill within that excavation should take place under <br /> the direction of a geotechnical engineer. it will be important that all loose soils be removed and/or <br /> ' recompacted prior to backfllling up to the foundation grades with structural fill. <br /> Due to the complexity of the soil conditions at the planned convenience store location, Geotech <br /> ' Consultants,. Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation services during <br /> construction. If another firm is retained to observe project earthwork activities, that firm would be <br /> responsible for assessing the bearing conditions, as well as the extent of overexcavation and <br /> ' backfill in structural areas. <br /> The on-site soils are generally silty and moisture sensitive, and some of the near surface soils are <br /> wet. It would be feasible to use the on-site soils as structural fill only during hot, dry weather, when <br /> drying the wetter soil by aeration is possible. <br /> Due to the significant silt content and dense nature of the native site soils, infiltration of stormwater <br /> is not feasible at the site. <br /> The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the <br /> weather conditions that are encountered. The area of clearing should be as limited as possible, as <br /> maintaining existing pavements and landscaping will help reduce the potential for erosion control <br /> problems. We anticipate that a silt fence may be needed around the downslope sides of any <br /> ' cleared areas. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during wet weather. <br /> On-site catch basins should be protected for soil and/or debris that may fall into them during <br /> demolition and site earthwork. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or <br /> ' hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious <br /> surface. <br />