Laserfiche WebLink
June 3, 2011 <br /> Project No. T-6578 <br /> 5.6 Retaining Walls <br /> Cast-in-Place <br /> The magnitude of earth pressure development on below-grade walls, such as basement or retaining walls, will <br /> partly depend on the quality of the wall backfill. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as <br /> structural fill as described in Section 5.2 of this report. <br /> To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, drainage must be installed behind the wall. A typical wall <br /> drainage detail is shown on Figure 4. <br /> With wall backfill placed and compacted as recommended and drainage properly installed, unrestrained walls can <br /> be designed for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pcf. For restrained walls, an additional <br /> uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be included. For evaluating the walls under seismic loading,a uniform <br /> earth pressure equivalent to 8H psf, where H is the height of the retained earth in feet,can be used. These values <br /> assume a horizontal backfill condition and that no other surcharge loading, such as traffic,sloping embankments, <br /> or adjacent buildings, will act on the wall. If such conditions exist, then the imposed loading must be included in <br /> the wall design. Friction at the base of the wall foundation and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to <br /> these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in Section 5.4 of this report. <br /> Rockeries • I <br /> As discussed, in our opinion, soil conditions would be suitable for using rockeries to face near-vertical cuts <br /> required along the eastern property line and structural fill in the northwest corner of the site. It should be noted <br /> that rockeries are not engineered structures that are designed to retain earth in a manner similar to a cast-in-place <br /> concrete or gravity block wall systems. Rocks used to construct the wall will by virtue of their mass enhance <br /> stability; however, the soil against which the rockery is constructed must be inherently stable and able to stand <br /> unsupported in a near-vertical condition. <br /> Based on our test pits, medium dense grading to very dense glacial till deposits will be exposed in the cut face 1 <br /> along the eastern property line. It is our opinion that an unreinforced rockery may face a near-vertical cut to the <br /> planned exposed height of 7.5 feet maximum. A fill rockery with a maximum height of four feet is planned in the , <br /> northwest margin of the site. Recommended eight-foot tall cut and four-foot tall fill rockery details are shown on <br /> Figure 5. If till rockeries over four feet in height are needed, the fill behind the rockery should be reinforced. <br /> We can provide a reinforced rockery design for a rockery of up to ten feet in height using a geotextile I <br /> reinforcement, if needed. <br /> 5.7 Drainage, I <br /> Surface I <br /> Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the building areas. We recommend <br /> providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeter, <br /> except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of two percent should be provided, unless <br /> provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. <br /> 111 <br /> Page No. 10 <br />