3810 RIVERFRONT BLVD BLDG B 2025-10-27

�yy�� Page 1 of 1 M itl &Associates, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Engineering Construction Testing and Inspection Field Report NO.: 09621171DFRI 102022ZZ DATE: 1/10/2022 Set Count: CONTRACTOR: SHELTER HOLDINGS PROJECT M 09621171 PERMIT #: B 1912-032 PROJECT: RIVERFRONT BLDG 'B° INSPECTOR: Zelalem Zerihun LOCATION: 3810 Riverfront Blvd, Everett, WA JURISDICTION: EVERETT KA P.M.: Jeffrey S. Mercer WEATHER: Cloudy TEMP: 40' F REPORT#95 Inspected item - L3 Floor Diaphragm L3 - Unblocked Diaphragm at 17 — 23/A — R (north section as per S4.12B) was re -inspected today as per RFI#234 (updated, January 10, 2022) for nail size discrepancy. We walked thru to ensure the contractor has added required additional nails and spacing throughout the deck. We verified that all sheathing panels installed perpendicular to supporting elements, panels staggered, maintained a —1/8" gap between panels, nailing at all panel edges, at intermediate, at shear walls below, at joist blocking, and at perimeter (after rim board alignment). The floor was fastened with the same nail size, 0. 13 1 X2-1/2", and spaced @ 6" OC at panel edges with additional edge nailing being 12" OC (every other space to existing 6" OC) and met or exceeded RFI4234 requirements. Previous Krazan report 491 dated 01/07 is now cleared. - Reviewed To the best of my know] regulatory requirements. ASTM Test #: Asset Numbers): the above WAS performed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and Technici Offices Serving the Western United States Lynnwood (425) 485-5519 - Poulsbo (360) 598-2126 - Tacoma (253) 939-2500 The information provided on this report is prepared for the exclusive use of the client. This report may not be reproduced in any format without the written permission of the client and Kraran & Associates. This report indicates our inspectors observation and testing results based on site conditions and contractor activities. This information is subject to review prior to final submittal. By signing this report, our inspector does not accept responsibility for validity of results. The same information has been provided by others on site.