My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3121 TULALIP AVE 2026-02-05
>
Address Records
>
TULALIP AVE
>
3121
>
3121 TULALIP AVE 2026-02-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2026 9:36:45 AM
Creation date
8/8/2025 11:02:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TULALIP AVE
Street Number
3121
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 959616 <br /> Watson Residence Addition July 6,2016 <br /> Everett, Washington Page 5 <br /> Landslide Hazard/Slope Stability <br /> The criteria used for evaluation of landslide hazards include soil type, slope gradient, and groundwater <br /> conditions. A steep northwest-facing slope with a gradient ranging from 30 to 35 degrees (58 to 70 <br /> percent) is located to the northeast of the existing residence. We did not observe signs of recent <br /> movement on the site slopes or obvious settlement of the existing residence foundation. <br /> Relatively shallow failures as well as surficial erosion are natural processes that could continue to occur <br /> on the steep slope. It is our opinion that while there is potential for erosion, soil creep, and shallow <br /> failures within the loose surficial and undocumented fill soils on the steep slope, the potential for deep- <br /> seated slope failures under current site conditions is low due to the competent glacial outwash soils <br /> interpreted to make up the slope. Proper site grading, setbacks and drainage as recommended in this <br /> letter should help maintain current stability conditions. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> General <br /> It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the site is compatible with the planned addition on <br /> the southern side of the residence within the relatively level grass yard area. In our opinion the planned <br /> earthwork associated with the additions should be minor and should not have adverse effects on the steep <br /> slope if conducted according to the recommendations presented in this letter. <br /> Our explorations within the proposed addition and deck area generally encountered medium dense or <br /> better native glacial soils at shallow depths. In our opinion, the native glacial soils should provide <br /> adequate support for the planned addition foundation, as well as the deck supports. We recommend that <br /> the footings be extended through any loose soil or undocumented fill and be embedded a minimum of <br /> one foot into the medium dense or better native soil underlying the site at depth. The medium dense or <br /> better soil should typically be encountered approximately one to two feet below the existing ground <br /> surface, based on our explorations. We understand that the new addition and deck will be setback <br /> approximately 50 and 43 feet from the top of the steep slope. In our opinion,these setbacks from the top <br /> of the steep slope are adequate. The recommended foundation embedment of at least one foot into the <br /> competent native soils along with the proposed structure setback should allow for normal slope recession <br /> during a reasonable life span of the structures provided that the site slope is not disturbed during or after <br /> construction. Setback and foundation details related to the planned improvements and additions are <br /> further discussed in the Structure Setback and Foundations subsection of this letter. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.