9910 EVERGREEN WAY BUZZ INN STEAKHOUSE 2025-09-11

February 28, 2022 96 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis CC18U No 880407 Project Number 2078679, Order 601554, Revision 0 Page 27 Section Elevation Size L Lu K!/r A Pu W Ratio No. Pu ft _ fl ft in2 K K �P� L1 96-88(1) TP12.75x12.75x0.375 8.00 0.00 0.0 14.579 -3.34 603.57 0.006 0 L2 88-42.25(2) TP20.865x144.1875 45.75 0.00 0.0 12.060 -7.99 705.52 0.011 1 L3 42.25-0(3) TP26.83x20.00220.1875 45.00 0.00 0.0 15.855 -12.26 927.55 0.013 6 Pole Bending Design Data Section Elevation Size MUX Wnx Ratio MY ¢Mn,. Ratio No. M, MY ft kip-ft kip-ft Wnx kip-ft kip-ft Wa L1 96-88(1) TP12.75x12.750.375 19.13 198.19 0.097 0.00 198.19 0.000 L2 88-42.25(2) TP20.865x14x0.1875 255.86 360.69 0.709 0.00 360.69 0.000 L3 42.25-0(3) TP26.83x20.00224.1875 560.60 569.72 0.984 0.00 569.72 0.000 Pole Shear Design Data Section Elevation Size Actual Vn Ratio Actual 0T Ratio No. V. Vu T. Tu ft K K �Vn kip-ft kip-ft Tn L1 96-88(1) TP12.75x12.754.375 2.80 181.07 0.015 0.00 197.00 0.000 L2 88-42.25(2) TP20.865x14x0.1875 6.36 211.66 0.030 0.07 375.62 0.000 L3 42.25-0(3) TP26,83x20.0022x0.1875 7.05 278.27 0.025 0.07 649.26 0.000 Pole Interaction Design Data Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P max MY Vn TV Stress Stress ¢P 0Mnx WM y �W �Tn Ratio Ratio L1 96-88(1) 0.006 0.097 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.102 1.050 4.8.2 L2 88-42.25(2) 0.011 0.709 0.000 0.030 0.000 0.722 1.050 4.8.2 L3 42.25-0(3) 0.013 0.984 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.998 1.050 4.8.2 Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P Opal.. % Pass No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail L1 96-88 Pole TP12.75x12.75x0.375 1 -3.34 633.75 9.7 Pass L2 88-42.25 Pole TP20.865x144.1875 2 -7.99 740.79 68.7 Pass L3 42.25-0 Pole TP26.83x20.00224.1875 3 -12.26 973.93 95.0 Pass Summary Pole(1-3) 95.0 Pass RATING= 95.0 Pass `NOTE:Above stress ratios for reinforced sections are approximate. More exact ca[culations are presented in Appendix C. tnxTower Report-version 8.1,1.0