My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8102 EVERGREEN WAY MALL KIOSK EVERETT 4 CORNERS - MAIL KIOSK Geotech Report 2025-08-22
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
8102
>
EVERETT 4 CORNERS - MAIL KIOSK
>
Geotech Report
>
8102 EVERGREEN WAY MALL KIOSK EVERETT 4 CORNERS - MAIL KIOSK Geotech Report 2025-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2025 7:50:43 AM
Creation date
8/22/2025 7:49:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
8102
Unit
MALL KIOSK
Tenant Name
EVERETT 4 CORNERS - MAIL KIOSK
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DevCo, Inc. <br />April 1, 2019 <br />Infiltration Feasibility <br />ES-6516 <br />Page 10 <br />As indicated in the Subsurface section of this report, native soils encountered during our fieldwork <br />were characterized primarily as dense to very dense glacial till deposits. Based upon the results <br />of USDA textural analyses performed on representative soil samples, native soils are also <br />classified as gravelly sandy loam, gravelly course sandy loam, and very gravelly loam. Fines <br />contents were about 30 to 47 percent within the sandy loam and about 50 percent within the <br />gravelly loam, at the tested locations. Given the appreciable fines contents and dense to very <br />dense in -situ condition of the till, it is our opinion full-scale infiltration is not feasible from a <br />geotechnical standpoint. Small scale infiltration devices incorporating overflow may be feasible <br />and can be further evaluated by ESNW, if requested. <br />Preliminary Detention Vault Design <br />Although unspecified at this time, we presume a detention vault will be used as the primary means <br />of stormwater management. Based on our experience with similar projects, we assume grade <br />cuts of 10 or more feet will be necessary to achieve the subgrade elevation of the vault foundation. <br />Based on our field observations, grade cuts for the vault are likely to expose dense to very dense, <br />undisturbed glacial till. <br />The vault foundation should be supported directly on competent native soils. Should <br />overexcavation(s) be necessary at the vault foundation subgrade, quarry spalls should be used <br />to restore grades. The final vault design must incorporate adequate buffer space from property <br />boundaries such that temporary excavations to construct the vault structure may be successfully <br />completed. Perimeter drains should be installed around the vault and conveyed to an approved <br />discharge point. Perched groundwater seepage should be anticipated within the vault <br />excavation; however, buoyancy is not expected to influence the vault structure. <br />The following preliminary design parameters may be used for the vault: <br />• Allowable soil bearing capacity <br />• Active earth pressure (unrestrained) <br />• Active earth pressure (unrestrained, hydrostatic) <br />• At -rest earth pressure (restrained) <br />• At -rest earth pressure (restrained, hydrostatic) <br />• Coefficient of friction <br />• Passive earth pressure <br />• Seismic surcharge <br />5,000 psf (dense native soil) <br />35 pcf <br />80 pcf <br />50 pcf <br />95 pcf <br />0.40 <br />350 pcf <br />6H psf* <br />* Where H equals the retained height (in feet) <br />Earth Solutions NW, LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.