Laserfiche WebLink
Substantive Requirements Review Landau Associates <br /> 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS <br /> The following sections describe the geologic setting of the site and the surrounding area and the <br /> subsurface conditions reported by others and observed during LAI's supplemental field investigation. <br /> Interpretations of site conditions are based on LAI's review of available geologic and geotechnical <br /> information and on the results of its site reconnaissance, subsurface explorations, and laboratory <br /> testing. <br /> 2.1 Review of Existing Data <br /> To develop preliminary design recommendations, LAI reviewed available geologic maps as well as <br /> geotechnical and environmental data gathered by others during previous site investigations (Chase T. <br /> Main, Inc. 1952; Dames and Moore 1990, 1993, 1995; Aspect Consulting 2013; Shannon &Wilson <br /> 2014). The approximate locations of previous geotechnical and environmental explorations are <br /> presented on Figure 2. <br /> 2.1.1 Geologic Setting <br /> Geologic information for the site and the surrounding area was obtained from the Preliminary Surficial <br /> Geologic Map of the Mukilteo and Everett Quadrangles, Snohomish County, Washington (Smith 1976). <br /> Surficial soil in the vicinity of the site is mapped as modified land. Based on the site history, this soil <br /> unit likely consists of non-engineered fill deposited during previous site development, which dates to <br /> the late 1800s. The non-engineered fill consists of interbedded sands and silts mixed with wood, <br /> concrete rubble, and other construction debris. <br /> 2.1.2 Subsurface Conditions <br /> Based on LAI's review of available geologic data, site subsurface conditions can be characterized as <br /> hydraulic fill placed during previous site development. The hydraulic fill has been described by others <br /> as consisting of very loose to medium dense sands and very soft to stiff silts with variable amounts of <br /> gravel and organics. The hydraulic fill in the northern half of the site has a high organic content, with <br /> areas that include up to 30 feet (ft) of pure wood waste. <br /> The heat map on Figure 3 represents the relative severity of wood waste deposits, based on LAI's <br /> aggregation of new and existing subsurface data.The relative wood waste ratings were developed in <br /> accordance with the following settlement factors: thickness of the wood waste deposit, concentration <br /> of wood waste (expressed as a percentage), depth to top of wood waste, and location of wood waste <br /> in regard to the groundwater table. The wood waste concentration is based on LAI's interpretation of <br /> the soil descriptions presented on historical borings logs. LAI's data review did not include organic <br /> matter content of site soils; as a result, the wood waste ratings on Figure 3 may be conservative in <br /> some areas and less conservative in others. <br /> Geotechnical Engineering Report 0121049.040.041 <br /> Norton Terminal Development&MTCA 3rd Interim Action 2-1 May 7,2021 <br />