Laserfiche WebLink
ASPECT CONSULTING <br />44 FINAL PROJECT NO. AS190583A-08  MAY 21, 2025 <br />Throughout the IA, Aspect collected verification soil samples for chemical analysis from <br />the sidewalls and bottoms of the excavations to assess compliance with IACLs. Chemical <br />analyses for the verification soil samples specific to each interim cleanup area were as <br />approved by Ecology. If the excavation verification sampling results indicated that IACLs <br />were not achieved in an area of the excavation, that portion of the excavation was <br />extended (overexcavated) to remove additional soil to meet IACLs to the extent <br />practicable. Soil impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons was left in place beneath very large <br />foundation elements within the USTs 71, 72, and 73 area, and beneath the distribution <br />warehouse (Bunker C ASTs area). In addition, residual soil concentrations of selected <br />metals (primarily copper, mercury, and zinc) within the excavation areas exceed IACLs <br />based on leaching to groundwater for protection of the marine environment. <br />The first IA included excavation dewatering as needed to facilitate excavation/handling of <br />soil. Water produced during dewatering was treated on-Site using a temporary water <br />treatment system prior to discharge of the treated water to the City’s sanitary sewer and <br />publicly owned treatment works (POTW) for further treatment, in accordance with City <br />Discharge Authorization (DA) number 254-13 granted to K-C in July 2013. More than <br />5.6 million gallons of groundwater were removed from the collective excavation areas for <br />treatment and discharge to the POTW, and more than 6,200 gallons of water with <br />free-phase petroleum product were collected and properly disposed of off-Site. <br />Monitoring was conducted by qualified archeological personnel from SWCA during <br />excavation within the Bunker C ASTs area, where penetration into underlying native soil <br />was considered possible. The archeological monitoring methods and findings are <br />summarized above in Section 2.3.1.1. <br />Approximately 24,650 cubic yards of imported aggregate were chemically tested and then <br />used for excavation backfill during the IA. In addition, approximately 1,700 cubic yards of <br />geotechnically suitable overburden soil were excavated from the Bunker C ASTs, Heavy <br />Duty Shop Sump, Naval Reserve Parcel UST, and Naval Reserve Parcel South areas and <br />temporarily stockpiled for sampling and analysis. To satisfy compaction criteria, the <br />overburden soil was used as backfill only above the water table. <br />All IA data representing in-place soil (i.e., representing current conditions) are <br />incorporated into this RI/FS. <br />4.1.2 Interim Action Confirmational Groundwater Monitoring (2014- <br />2016) <br />Postconstruction confirmational groundwater monitoring was conducted for the IA areas, <br />in accordance with the Ecology-approved Confirmational Groundwater Monitoring Work <br />Plan (Aspect, 2014d). The goal of the groundwater monitoring is to assess whether the <br />completed IA soil cleanup activities are protective of groundwater (i.e., whether sources of <br />leachable contaminants have been eliminated). The monitoring program included the <br />monitoring of 38 wells, 36 of which were newly installed, at 14 excavation areas.15 <br /> <br />15 Groundwater monitoring was not conducted at the Heavy Duty Shop Sump area since soil <br />contamination was not encountered (refer to IA Report; Aspect, 2015a).