Laserfiche WebLink
ASPECT CONSULTING <br />88 FINAL PROJECT NO. AS190583A-08  MAY 21, 2025 <br /> <br />Again, well REC7-MW-4 does not fit the pattern (average nickel in REC7-MW-4 is <br />driven by one high detection; Table 6-10); however, there is not another reason apparent <br />for the shoreline groundwater nickel exceedances based on the other Unit A soil and <br />groundwater data. This phenomenon of higher dissolved nickel with higher D.O. is also <br />observed in Unit B shoreline wells, as described below in Section 6.4.2.2.6. <br />No dissolved nickel exceedances were detected in the SEEP-1 samples (Table 6-22). <br />Contaminant transport modeling indicates that a groundwater nickel concentration of <br />approximately 380 µg/L in Unit A shoreline monitoring wells is estimated to be protective <br />of intertidal sediment and surface water quality (Table 6-22). All detected dissolved nickel <br />concentrations in Unit A shoreline wells are considerably less than that value (Table 6-10). <br />6.5.1.2.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls <br />There are two Unit A exceedances of total PCBs in soil: a single sample collected from <br />boring GF-B-15A, where total PCBs were reported at a concentration of 0.22 mg/kg in <br />saturated soil, and a sidewall sample collected from second IA OMS area where total <br />PCBs were reported at a concentration of 24 mg/kg, above the MTCA and federal EPA <br />(40 C.F.R. 761.61) industrial land use soil standard of 10 mg/kg, in unsaturated soil (Table <br />6-18). The soil that contains total PCBs (which is composed entirely of Aroclor 1254) at <br />the southeast corner of the OMS area excavation is located near the top of the steep <br />shoreline bank of the off-loading dock slip and next to a 36-inch diameter wood stave pipe <br />that is located within the upper portion of that bank. Based on consultation with Ecology <br />during the second IA, the OMS area excavation was completed to its maximum <br />practicable limits and further excavation was deemed not feasible without potentially <br />compromising the stability of the bank and risking slope failure into the East Waterway <br />(Aspect, 2021). There is limited groundwater data for PCBs in Unit A but a single sample <br />collected from historical OMS area well OMS-MW-02 in 2015 did not contain PCBs <br />above the laboratory reporting limits, indicating empirically that PCBs may not be <br />MW-1 <br />MW-2 <br />OMS-MW-1 <br />OMS-MW-2REC1-MW-4 <br />REC1-MW-5 <br />REC1-MW-6 REC1-MW-8 <br />REC1-MW-9 <br />REC1-MW-14 <br />REC7-MW-3 <br />REC7-MW-4 <br />0 <br />2 <br />4 <br />6 <br />8 <br />10 <br />12 <br />14 <br />16 <br />0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Avg. Nickel in ug/LAvg. Dissolved Oxygen in mg/L <br />Unit A Groundwater: Nickel vs. D.O. <br />Shoreline Wells