Laserfiche WebLink
ASPECT CONSULTING <br />PROJECT NO. AS190583A-08  MAY 21, 2025 FINAL 93 <br /> <br />prior to analysis of cPAHs if turbidity was measured in the field to be greater than <br />25 NTU. Within Unit B, this included some of the samples collected from wells <br />RCD-MW-101, UST71-MW-101, -102, and -103 (centrifuged samples are noted in <br />Table 6-14). The wells with the highest detected total cPAHs (TEQ) concentrations— <br />UST71-MW-102 and UST71-MW-103, which could not be effectively developed as <br />described above—also have the highest turbidities measured, but the high-turbidity <br />samples were centrifuged prior to PAH analysis. There is a reasonable weight of evidence <br />to indicate that sample turbidity contributed to the cPAH exceedances in wells <br />UST71-MW-102 and -103, but the data are inconclusive as to whether the sporadic cPAH <br />exceedances elsewhere in Unit B groundwater samples can be attributed to high turbidity. <br />At well BA-MW-05, the detected groundwater concentrations of the 2-methylnaphthalene <br />and fluorene (Table 6-14) and dibenzofuran (Table 6-17) exceeded their PCLs. <br />Naphthalenes and dibenzofuran are PAHs commonly associated with creosote-treated <br />wood. Concentrations of dibenzofuran and 2-methylnaphthalene are below the PCLs in <br />both groundwater samples collected from historical shoreline well BA-MW-07, located <br />downgradient of well BA-MW-05. There are no surface water criteria for <br />2-methylnaphthalene or dibenzofuran; therefore, the groundwater PCLs are based on <br />potable water (Table 5-1). Note that 2-methylnaphthalene is not routinely reported as part <br />of the laboratory’s PAH analysis, and there are very limited soil data for it in Unit B. No <br />concentrations of fluorene in Unit B soil exceeded the PCL (Table 6-13). Dibenzofuran <br />was detected in 1 out of 85 Unit B soil samples analyzed for it, at a trace concentration <br />(0.04 mg/kg) (Table 6-16). Given the very low frequency and magnitude of exceedance, <br />limited to groundwater at a single location, dibenzofuran, fluorene, and <br />2-methylnaphthalene are not considered contaminants of concern within Unit B. <br />6.5.2.2 Metals <br />Five IA areas within Unit B focused on the removal of soil contaminated with metals: <br />Boiler/Baghouse area, GF-11 area (lead), GFB12 area (mercury), PM-B-6 area (copper <br />and mercury), and REC5-MW-01 area (arsenic, copper, and lead) (Figure 6-B1). The <br />Boiler/Baghouse area was initially excavated as part of the first IA, primarily because lead <br />concentrations were detected above the industrial PCL in soil samples collected as part of <br />the Phase 2 ESA (Aspect, 2013a). The Boiler/Baghouse area was further excavated during <br />the second IA to remove copper, mercury, and zinc that were a suspected ongoing source <br />to groundwater (Aspect, 2021). Approximately 11,200 tons of metals-contaminated soil <br />were excavated from these five IA areas in total. The soil excavated from the GF-11 area <br />was designated as characteristic hazardous waste and was treated and disposed of at a <br />Subtitle C landfill, as described by Aspect (2015a). The 1,000 mg/kg IA soil cleanup level <br />for lead (based on industrial) in unsaturated soil, equivalent to the PCL, was met at the <br />limits of both of these excavation areas (Aspect, 2015a; Figure 6-B7). Concentrations of <br />copper, mercury, and zinc exceeding the soil PCLs were detected in soil remaining at the <br />limits of these excavation areas. <br />Arsenic, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc are detected exceeding the PCLs in <br />groundwater samples collected from select Unit B wells. The metals exceedances were <br />detected primarily within the northwest area of Unit B, within the area of the former <br />boilers/steam plant, baghouse, and hog fuel storage. The following sections describe the