Laserfiche WebLink
ASPECT CONSULTING <br />98 FINAL PROJECT NO. AS190583A-08  MAY 21, 2025 <br />footprint prior to the second IA. The second IA removed the presumptive source of PCBs <br />to groundwater in that area while also removing a large quantity of contaminated <br />groundwater during dewatering of the large excavation. <br />In accordance with the RI/FS Work Plan (Aspect, 2013c), three soil samples collected <br />during the RI with the highest concentrations of total PCBs were also submitted for <br />analysis of PCB congeners to support future work in the East Waterway RI/FS; each of the <br />three samples was collected from Unit B (from explorations BA-MW-02, PM-B-06, and <br />PM-B-07; Figure 2-4). Of these, only the soil sample collected from BA-MW-02 is <br />representative of current conditions; the soil PCB congener data for this sample is <br />provided on Table 6-19. Figure 6-B14 presents histograms of PCB congener composition <br />(as weight percent of total PCB congener concentration) for the three soil samples. The <br />sample histograms can be compared to plots of congener composition (by weight percent) <br />for the common PCB Aroclors,35 including the three Aroclors detected in Upland Area <br />soil (Aroclors 1016, 1254, and 1260), which are presented in Appendix J. In Figure 6-B14, <br />nondetected congeners are plotted as zero, so the histogram pattern is not obscured by <br />numerous nondetections (if plotted as one-half the reporting limit). The distribution of <br />PCB congeners appears generally consistent with the detected Aroclors in the samples: <br />lighter molecular weight congeners constitute a greater percentage of the total PCB <br />concentration in the BA-MW-02 sample (with detectable Aroclor 1016), whereas the <br />PM-B6 and PM-B7 samples (with detectable Aroclors 1254 and 1260) both have a greater <br />percentage of moderate-molecular-weight congeners. <br />6.5.2.4 Un-Ionized Ammonia <br />Un-ionized ammonia was not detected above the 0.035 mg/L PCL in groundwater samples <br />collected from any of the shoreline wells in Unit B (Figure 6-S3). Un-ionized ammonia <br />was detected above the PCL in one of two porewater samples collected from the PW-03 <br />location (0.14 mg/L; Table 6-12). Each of the un-ionized ammonia concentrations <br />detected in Unit B intertidal porewater was less than the NOEC of 0.46 mg/L (Kendall and <br />Barton, 2004), and they are in the range of background concentrations in Puget Sound <br />sediments (USGS, 2010). <br />6.5.2.5 Sulfide <br />Total dissolved sulfide concentrations in groundwater were below the PCL at each of the <br />six Unit B shoreline wells. High total dissolved sulfide concentrations were detected in <br />three of four intertidal porewater samples collected from two locations beneath the dock <br />and downgradient of the former Boilers area in February and August 2014 <br />(8.8 to 23.5 mg/L at PW-03; nondetect to 9.1 mg/L at PW-04). However, applying the <br />more reliable DGT sulfide sampling methodology in February 2015, hydrogen sulfide <br />(H2S) was not detected at either porewater sample location (Table 6-12). The data indicate <br />that the prior variable detections of total dissolved sulfide are attributable to mineral <br />sulfides in the samples, not H2S. <br /> <br />35 Obtained from http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/pdf/aroclorplots.pdf.