My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 4175-26
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 4175-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2026 1:13:14 PM
Creation date
5/11/2026 1:10:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
4175-26
Date
4/15/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Exhibit B <br />ORDINANCE Exhibit A - Page 23 of 55 <br />5. Describe the future vegetation community types for monitoring years, including dominant <br />vegetation expected. Plants shall be native species, commercially available or available from <br />local sources, high in food and cover value for fish and wildlife, and mostly perennial; <br />6. Specify when mitigation will occur relative to project construction and to the requirements <br />of permits issued by other agencies; <br />7. Include measurable criteria for evaluating whether the performance goals of the mitigation <br />proposal have been met, and include provisions for maintenance and monitoring the mitigated <br />area on a long-term basis to determine whether the plan was successful; <br />8. Include a contingency plan specifying what corrective actions will be taken to achieve <br />performance goals should the mitigation not be successful; and <br />9. Include provisions for an assurance device as provided by Chapter 19.40 to ensure that work <br />is completed in accordance with the mitigation plan, that maintenance and monitoring occur on <br />a regular basis, and that restoration or rehabilitation is performed in accordance with the <br />contingency plan if mitigation failure results within five years of implementation. The <br />construction performance guarantees shall not be released until the applicant’s qualified <br />professional and the planning director sign off to indicate that construction has been completed <br />as planned. A separate performance assurance device shall be required for maintenance, <br />monitoring, and contingency. This guarantee shall not be released until the applicant’s qualified <br />professional and the planning director sign off that maintenance and monitoring have been <br />completed per the plan, and the mitigation meets performance goals. <br />B. Stream, lake and buffer impact mitigation plans shall: <br />1. Include a baseline study that quantifies the existing functions of the system, functions that <br />will be lost, and the stream and buffer functions after mitigation; <br />2. Specify how functions will be replaced; <br />3. Specify when mitigation will occur relative to project construction and to the requirements <br />of permits issued by other agencies; <br />4. Where buffer enhancement is proposed, include an analysis of the ability of the buffer to <br />protect water quality, as outlined in the Update on Wetland Buffers: The State of the Science, <br />Final Report, October 2013, Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 13-06-11, <br />or as amended; <br />5. Include provisions for maintaining and monitoring the mitigated area on a long-term basis to <br />determine whether the plan was successful; <br />6. Include a contingency plan specifying what corrective actions will be taken should the <br />mitigation not be successful; and <br />7. Include provisions for an assurance device as provided by Chapter 19.40 EMC to ensure that <br />work is completed in accordance with the mitigation plan and that restoration or rehabilitation
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.