Ordinance 2530-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

23. Parking reduction with transportation management plan(EMC 19.34.070.D) 24. Phase approval and development approval implementing an institutional overlay zone master plan or approval of minor revisions (can't change use or character or allow increase in intensity of development) as provided by EMC 19.33.B.060 25. Public park development not part of or in conformance with an adopted master plan or which exceeds the City's SEPA thresholds for categorical exemptions as provided by EMC 19.33.A.030B 26. Conceptual site plan review at an applicant's request for projects that do not otherwise require a land use permit and are not categorically exempt under SEPA 27. Project review for public projects that are not categorically exempt under SEPA 28. Proposals required to be reviewed by the Historic Commission in the Historic Overlay Zone per neighborhood conservation guidelines and historic zoning overlay standards (not including those listed under administrative review by staff which is Review Process I) 29. Reasonable Use Determinations with modification of zoning standards (under EMC 19.37) 30. Reestablishment or change in use of nonconforming grocery store as provided by EMC 19.38.100B(1) 31. Shoreline permits (less than 1 acre of the project footprint area is within shoreline jurisdiction) 32. Stream and wetland filling, modification, and mitigation as provided for in EMC 19.37 33. Transfer of development rights under EMC 19.37.050D 34. Wetland alteration for Category 1, Category II and Silver Lake watershed as provided by EMC 19.37.110B (1), (2), and(5) 35. Wetland mitigation banking approval as provided by EMC 19.37.110C(10) 36. All other review processes listed in the Zoning Code as Review Process II 37. All Review Process I and project permit applications that are not categorically exempt under SEPA * SEPA threshold determinations frequently include mitigation requirements as provided for in the SEPA ordinance. Any SEPA condition based on SEPA substantive authority as provided for in the SEPA Ordinance shall be identified in the land use permit decision, as provided in this integrated local project review process. ** An open public hearing may be required under the following circumstances, in which case the application shall be processed under Review Process III: (i) a public hearing is required by EMC 18; (ii) any affected person files a written request for a hearing with the Planning Department within twenty-one (21) days of the notice of application (public comment period); or (iii) either prior to or within the public comment period, the Director or the City Engineer and/or their designees require an open public hearing. 14