Laserfiche WebLink
6. If the City indicated potentially significant adverse environmental impacts,but <br /> did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow it to issue a DNS, <br /> the City shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as <br /> appropriate. <br /> a. The applicant's proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or <br /> conditions)must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to <br /> "control noise"or"prevent storm water runoff' are inadequate whereas proposals <br /> to "muffle machinery to X decibel"or"construct two hundred-foot storm water <br /> retention pond at Y location"may be adequate. <br /> b. Environmental documents need not be revised and resubmitted if the <br /> clarifications or changes to the proposal are stated in writing in attachments to, or <br /> documents incorporated by reference into, the environmental review record. An <br /> addendum may be used in compliance with WAC 197-11-600 and WAC 197-11- <br /> 425. <br /> c. If a proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse <br /> environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, an EIS shall be prepared. <br /> 7. The City's written response to a request for early notice under the mitigated DNS <br /> provisions of this section shall not be construed as a determination of <br /> significance. <br /> G. Optional DNS Process. To provide for an integrated project review process, the <br /> City will use the optional DNS process as set forth in WAC 197-11-355, unless the <br /> responsible official determines that another SEPA threshold determination process would <br /> more effectively implement SEPA procedures and requirements. <br /> 1. When the responsible official has a reasonable basis for determining significant <br /> adverse environmental impacts are unlikely, the City may use a single integrated <br /> comment period to obtain comments on the notice of application and the likely <br /> threshold determination for the proposal. If this process is used, a second <br /> comment period will typically not be required when the final DNS is issued(see <br /> subsection 4 of this section). <br /> 2. If the City uses the optional process specified in subsection 1 of this section, the <br /> City shall: <br /> a. State on the first page of the notice of application that it expects to issue a <br /> DNS for the proposal, and that: <br /> 1) The optional DNS process is being used; <br /> 50 <br />