My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2531-01
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2531-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 2:24:27 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 2:24:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2531-01
Date
8/22/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11. Accessibility to public transit, and traffic reduction measures proposed by the <br /> applicant to reduce dependence of the proposed use on the automobile. <br /> D. Evaluation Criteria for Specific Uses. The uses which are listed in this paragraph are <br /> classified as special property uses. When the use-standards table of a particular zone <br /> allows one of the following uses, subject to Review Process II, IIW A, the review <br /> authority shall consider the following factors listed for a specific use as a basis for • <br /> approving, disapproving or approving with modifications a proposed use, in addition to <br /> the general evaluation criteria listed in subsection C of this section: <br /> 1. Governmental or Quasi-Governmental Activities. <br /> a. Parks, Playground and Public Recreational Facilities. <br /> (1) Park buildings exceeding one thousand square feet in size shall be located a <br /> minimum of fifty feet from adjoining residentially zoned properties. <br /> (2) Accessory buildings containing less than one thousand square feet shall be reviewed <br /> using Review Process I. <br /> b. Above Ground Utility and Communications Facilities. <br /> (1) Major utility and communications facilities shall be designed, landscaped or <br /> otherwise screened to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties. Above ground <br /> utility and communications structures and antennas shall be designed, constructed, <br /> painted and screened so as to blend with surrounding uses and buildings. The review <br /> authority may impose additional restrictions on the location, setbacks, height, design, <br /> landscaping and screening of above ground utility and communications facilities if <br /> necessary to minimize visual impacts and promote greater compatibility with existing or <br /> planned uses on surrounding properties. <br /> (2) Antennas associated with above ground utility or communications facilities shall be <br /> located on existing or replacement towers or structures to the maximum extent <br /> technically feasible to discourage the proliferation of tower structures. Installation or co- <br /> location of antennas on existing or replacement towers or structures shall be preferred <br /> unless the proponent can demonstrate that a new structure is necessary to adequately <br /> serve the needs of the public. When proposed to be installed on an existing or <br /> replacement tower or structure located in a nonresidential zone located at least three <br /> hundred feet from residential zones, facilities which are subject to Review Process II <br /> shall be reviewed using Review Process I, subject to meeting all requirements of this <br /> section. When proposed to be located on an existing or replacement utility or <br /> communications structure or other nonresidential structure in a residential zone, Review <br /> Process II shall be required. <br /> (3) Tower structures for above ground utility and/or communications facilities shall not <br /> be located in or within three hundred feet of residentially zoned areas, in or within two <br /> hundred feet of gateway corridors as designated by the Everett comprehensive plan, or in <br /> or within two hundred feet of areas under the jurisdiction of the shoreline master <br /> program, unless the applicant provides an analysis of alternative sites and existing <br /> facilities which are technically feasible where the structure could be located or co-located <br /> which demonstrates that the proposed facility cannot adequately serve the needs of the <br /> public for the proposed utility or communications service in an alternative location. <br /> When location in or within two hundred feet of a gateway corridor, or in or within two <br /> hundred feet of areas under the jurisdiction of the shoreline master program, is necessary <br /> to serve the public need for utility or communications services, use of existing or <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.