1105 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-08-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

CITY OF EVERETT PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISION Review Process II #10-018 December 7, 2010 The City of Everett P1aruling Director grants approval of a request by Patrick O'Conner to construct an 22' x 24' detached garage with horizontal lap siding and composite roofing with a pitch of b:12, up to a maximum height of 20 feet, located at 1105 Rockefeller Avenue with the following conditions: 1. Any change to the design, square footage and/or roof pitch oi the proposed garage requires Planning Director approval. 2. A covenant acceptable to the City Attorney's office shall be recorded on the title to the property stating that the property owner acknowledges the requirements of EMC 19.07.020, and stating that the use of any accessory structure is limited to accessory activities permitted by the zone in which the property is located, and that the accessory building shall not be converted to living area or used for any purposes which are not in full compliance with zoning and building code requirements. 3. The garage's siding and roofing material must be compatible with the existing dwelling. Chapter 7 of the Everett Municipal Code (EMC) states that the Planning Director may look at such factors as view obstruction, aesthetic impact on surrounding properties, and impact on neighborhood charaeter. The Planning Director approved the detached garage based on the follo��ing: The subject property is a 5,495 square foot lot with a 1,862 gross square foot dwelling unit; an eYisting 400 square foot detached garage will be demolished for the project. The proposed 528 square foot, detached garage with storage above will be located to the northeast of the residence and accessed from the alley. The garage has been designed to compliment the residence and the surrounding neighborhood. The garage should not obstruct views. The eYisting garage was certified as having nonconforming setback from the north lot line under NCB #10-027. The e�isting garage is setback from the north lot line by 1'- 6". There were no comments submitted by neighboring property owners. �` �� '�I , � � � � �� - . ._��. � -i. �f -. � _-� . -�� L�11� L11V�..I.V1 .. and Cominunity Development Depai-tment REV II 10-01 b