Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Steve Miller <br />From: Steve Miller <br />Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 3:41 PM <br />To: 'Richard Glasman' <br />Subject: RE: 2730 Oaks <br />Richard, <br />We could accept the guard based on the last email and conversatian. I will put this in the file and await the revision set. <br />Thank you, Steve <br />From: Richard Glasman [mailto:richardgCa�mgarchitecture.net] <br />Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 3:10 PM <br />To: Steve Miller <br />Subject: RE: 2730 Oaks <br />Steve, <br />Just left you a voice mail. My email was actualiy asking if Everett had any issues with using wire in a guard rail. There will <br />be no one but nursing mothers with babes in arms allowed in the oniy room with potential access to the mezzanine rail. <br />All toddlers are check-in downstairs and tightly supervised in the toddler area. Not to mention that the only door to this <br />un-usable 30" wide mezzanine space will be locked. <br />But this is beside the point. I don't see how kids using this building affects this very clear exception in the IBC which is <br />actually made so that kids and short folks can actually see the show in a space like this... or Comcast Arena, or the Aqua <br />sox park or any number of churches in Everett (including OLPH and St Mary Magdalen... both of which I have worked <br />on). <br />As I mention above, given the odd nature of the space (the "mezzanine hallway") I doubt any one will ever have access <br />to it... other than those folks {sound, lighting, etc...) who are putting on the show. Based on the phone conversation we <br />just had as I was writing this email, I appreciate your willingness to reconsider the wire spacing for this guard rail <br />extension. <br />Richard Glasman, LEEDap <br />��� ��� t`� �� �i ��� �� �� <br />206.323.2173 <br />From: Steve Miller [mailto:SMillerCa�everettwa.gov] <br />Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 2:09 PM <br />To: 'Richard Glasman' <br />Subject: RE: 2730 Oaks <br />Hi Richard, <br />Will this proposed guard really be in an assembly seatir�g area as described in exception 5? Also the proposed plans <br />indicate the potential for the presence of children. i don't think we could accept the detaii as proposed. <br />Thank you, Steve <br />From: Richard Glasman [mailto:richardg@mgarchitecture.net] <br />Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:38 AM <br />